It's clear the films are intended to try as wring as many dollars as possible from this thing, hence the technical gimmicks of 3D and 48-frame resolution, the padding to try to increase the length, and the silly set-piece action/slap-stick.
I saw the 3D, 48-frame version, which neither add or subtract in my view, in other words, they are just gimmicks. 3D is 3D, never really adds much, the 48-frames I didn't think made much difference either.
Then there is the silly action scenes, not in the books, which are just like a dumb video game really. You had some of these pointless scenes in LotR as well, which, the more often you see them, the more you realize they stick out like sore-thumbs.
That said, the lore and details of the Tolkien world are explored in depth by Jackson, with lovingly crafted backstories, so I didn't actually mind the length. In fact, Tolkien geeks will like this. The characters are good fun, especially Bilbo, as well as the dwarves. The riddle scene with Gollum and Bilbo is definitely brilliant, thats the high-light of the movie.
Still enjoyable.
I saw the 3D, 48-frame version, which neither add or subtract in my view, in other words, they are just gimmicks. 3D is 3D, never really adds much, the 48-frames I didn't think made much difference either.
Then there is the silly action scenes, not in the books, which are just like a dumb video game really. You had some of these pointless scenes in LotR as well, which, the more often you see them, the more you realize they stick out like sore-thumbs.
That said, the lore and details of the Tolkien world are explored in depth by Jackson, with lovingly crafted backstories, so I didn't actually mind the length. In fact, Tolkien geeks will like this. The characters are good fun, especially Bilbo, as well as the dwarves. The riddle scene with Gollum and Bilbo is definitely brilliant, thats the high-light of the movie.
Still enjoyable.
This message last edited by Sports_Gambler on 15/12/2012 at 11:46:21 AM
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
- 13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
2760 Views
As for the 3D...
- 13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
1506 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
- 14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
1388 Views
I liked it. There are some nitpicks, but overall it is enjoyable
- 14/12/2012 04:50:28 PM
1310 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
- 15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
1377 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
- 15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
1415 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
- 16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
1374 Views
Looks like it.
- 16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
1284 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
- 16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
1237 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
- 28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
629 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
- 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
1282 Views
Commercial, forgettable but enjoyable
- 15/12/2012 11:42:53 AM
1300 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
- 28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
1321 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
- 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
1296 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
- 11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
748 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
- 08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
1373 Views


