If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
He just kind of exists to give some kind of recognizable face to the orcs, as opposed to "oh, here are some more monsters"
It doesn't really change the story, and it makes for a better movie.
It doesn't really change the story, and it makes for a better movie.
I amuse myself.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
- 2243 Views
As for the 3D...
13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
- 1042 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
- 931 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
- 928 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
- 925 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
- 883 Views
Looks like it.
16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
- 794 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
- 778 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
- 389 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
- 812 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
- 853 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
- 834 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
- 449 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
- 918 Views