View original postAre you trying to say low-brow? Because I'm judging Bond by low-brow standards to begin with. I'm not expecting a Tarkovsky art house classic here.
Yes-ish. It's something that sounds fun, and you know you can enjoy, but going to see it/"eating the popcorn" is as much or more fun than the movie.
I did enjoy it, but I didn't have high expectations, and I have never developed the "Bond Standards." It worked for me as an enjoyable movie.
After losing interest 3 times in Skyfall,I realize the Bond franchise is a retarded shadow of itself
- 10/03/2013 07:06:31 PM
1372 Views
I enjoyed it.
- 10/03/2013 08:01:16 PM
965 Views
What exactly is a "popcorn movie"?
- 11/03/2013 08:40:32 PM
868 Views
I'm not sure mine is the definitive meaning, but
- 15/03/2013 10:42:25 PM
936 Views
I thought it was alright
- 11/03/2013 05:33:43 AM
953 Views
I haven't been fond of Daniel Craig James Bond.
- 11/03/2013 05:57:41 PM
1251 Views
That's why they call it a reboot. And let's face it, the franchise needed it.
- 13/03/2013 12:35:11 PM
963 Views
why did they need a reboot? Every Bond movie ever made money
- 17/03/2013 12:02:14 PM
987 Views
It's fine and dandy that the movies made money, but the point is the movies sucked.
- 19/03/2013 11:00:22 AM
937 Views
They could have made the exact same movie and just changed his name and I would have liked it
- 23/03/2013 03:58:01 PM
954 Views
It should have been called "Bond fails at everything he tries to accomplish."
- 13/03/2013 12:43:42 PM
953 Views
Yes, it's because I remember when Bond movies were fun that I posted this.
- 13/03/2013 01:52:37 PM
943 Views
I think the answer is that different audiences enjoy them now. The usual darker/grittier redux.
- 15/03/2013 07:58:04 PM
993 Views
Toldja
- 16/03/2013 04:59:23 PM
1069 Views
I really appreciated that.
- 17/03/2013 04:47:10 PM
1011 Views
As dead as his eyes? Because he has some seriously creepy eyes. *NM*
- 18/03/2013 01:58:08 PM
511 Views
