Active Users:247 Time:24/04/2024 02:29:38 AM
Quick thoughts on a couple of your complaints. Aemon Send a noteboard - 19/05/2013 12:57:28 AM

On Kirk's death: From what I could tell, there was no indication of how much time passed between "death" and Tribble-eureka. Presumably they'd have taken Kirk out of that compartment and directly to sick bay; it might have been a matter of a few minutes. Even with 2013 medicine, people can be dead for several minutes (even an hour or two if they pass out in a frozen lake or something) and still be revived. It doesn't seem like a huge stretch to imagine that superblood could stave off acute radiation poisoning just long enough to get Kirk to a future-hospital. You don't really have to assume that the blood was capable of fully regenerating a decaying dead body.

On Starfleet headquarters: are you sure that was Starfleet headquarters? The computer stated that because of the malfunctions (or whatever) the target could not be guaranteed. And the ship crashed initially into the ocean, which probably wasn't Khan's intention; that says to me that maybe he missed. Unless I'm forgetting some piece of evidence, which is certainly possible. Anyway it obviously destroyed some buildings and stuff, but I don't remember anything about them being Starfleet buildings in particular.

Reply to message
Star Trek Into Darkness - 09/05/2013 11:21:06 PM 2063 Views
Thanks for the review! Looking forward to this movie big-time. - 10/05/2013 03:43:37 AM 795 Views
You really love getting spoiled, don't you? - 10/05/2013 02:37:39 PM 801 Views
I do like spoilers! - 10/05/2013 03:36:00 PM 754 Views
Re: You really love getting spoiled, don't you? - 11/05/2013 11:38:06 PM 1370 Views
This review really has my fingers itching - 11/05/2013 06:33:58 PM 798 Views
I could write a reply with lots of spoilers, I suppose - 11/05/2013 08:30:06 PM 775 Views
Alright, let's talk massive Spoilers. You really shouldn't...until you've seen it. - 15/05/2013 03:27:41 PM 894 Views
is it wrong I was lauging my ass off when ... ((SPOILER)) - 17/05/2013 07:38:09 PM 818 Views
I think, as a fan of the original story, this was very well-done. - 18/05/2013 02:04:22 AM 1076 Views
Amazing...I completely agree with Cannoli's post. - 30/05/2013 04:58:39 PM 780 Views
It's because I like movies... - 31/05/2013 04:02:38 PM 799 Views
I think you just like summer Hollywood blockbusters. *NM* - 10/06/2013 05:16:55 PM 438 Views
How is David Marcus of "Wrath of Khan" such a pussy when he's the grandson of Thor & Robocop? - 18/05/2013 01:30:24 AM 972 Views
Starfleet's militarization - 18/05/2013 06:12:44 PM 948 Views
I found that to be 90 percent of a fun movie. (spoilers) - 18/05/2013 10:58:30 PM 807 Views
Quick thoughts on a couple of your complaints. - 19/05/2013 12:57:28 AM 1079 Views
Re: Quick thoughts on a couple of your complaints. - 19/05/2013 01:13:08 AM 948 Views
Re: Quick thoughts on a couple of your complaints. - 19/05/2013 08:25:36 AM 1044 Views
The film was an acceptable, but unremarkable addition to the franchise - 19/05/2013 04:01:41 PM 934 Views
Loved the homage to Wrath of Khan..... - 22/05/2013 04:26:07 AM 750 Views
It was more humorous than serious, came off wrong to me - 22/05/2013 05:01:56 AM 831 Views
To me it came off as a nice homage, but that was precisely my problem with the film. - 10/06/2013 05:12:13 PM 926 Views
I couldn't agree more - 10/06/2013 05:52:52 PM 821 Views
I thought the same. *NM* - 06/06/2013 10:11:43 PM 372 Views
Just saw it.....one of the best Star Trek movies ever! - 22/05/2013 04:20:22 AM 772 Views
Definitely. Even though competition isn't that big - 22/05/2013 04:05:19 PM 898 Views

Reply to Message