Active Users:447 Time:18/06/2025 10:14:13 AM
Re: That either means... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 05/07/2014 05:10:12 PM

View original post
View original post
a) the character plays no big part in the books anymore either, so Martin signaled them it's okay to skip it. (the question then would be: why resurrect her in the first place?).

b) they don't need her to play an Undead they'll introduce later.


or c) She's lying. I call C), that way the book readers can be all sad and then it will be a major spoiler to everyone when it actually happens.


Well, as I said to Dom above, I doubt an actress of her age and resume would blatantly lie about such a thing. I guess we'll know sooner or later when they start filming next season as they won't be able to hide her on the set. I suspect maybe they were not sure whether to use her or not and then when they finally gave the answer, that they scratched the character, she went ahead and said she was done.

But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
'Game of Thrones' star Michelle Fairley drops major spoiler - 28/06/2014 05:35:05 AM 1068 Views
Article text in this link - MAJOR SPOILER - 28/06/2014 05:38:05 AM 805 Views
Very interesting..... - 29/06/2014 07:57:27 PM 661 Views
Re: Very interesting..... - 30/06/2014 03:17:20 AM 656 Views
Re: Very interesting..... - 05/07/2014 05:07:50 PM 697 Views
Re: Very interesting..... - 05/07/2014 04:55:28 PM 714 Views
Re: Very interesting..... - 05/07/2014 08:11:11 PM 573 Views
Martin does like to invest large chunks to minor story lines - 14/07/2014 04:36:27 PM 624 Views
That either means... - 30/06/2014 08:28:27 AM 624 Views
Re: That either means... - 30/06/2014 08:01:27 PM 619 Views
Possibly, yeah *NM* - 02/07/2014 08:38:29 AM 264 Views
Re: That either means... - 05/07/2014 05:10:12 PM 701 Views

Reply to Message