I generally approve. There were a few things that irked me, but I won't object too much.
I wish they could have resisted using Irene Adler as a romantic foil, and the deductions Watson makes from the watch is lifted from a book where Holmes make them in order to astonish Watson.
Also Holmes is always described as impeccably dressed (unless dressing to hide who he is).
None of these were fatal, though. I am not convinced it was entirely Sherlock Holmes, but it was an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud quite a lot.
I confess I doubted they would stick to the rational solutions at one point (when Holmes appeared to attempt the black arts in desperation), but I should have had more faith.
I wish they could have resisted using Irene Adler as a romantic foil, and the deductions Watson makes from the watch is lifted from a book where Holmes make them in order to astonish Watson.
Also Holmes is always described as impeccably dressed (unless dressing to hide who he is).
None of these were fatal, though. I am not convinced it was entirely Sherlock Holmes, but it was an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud quite a lot.
I confess I doubted they would stick to the rational solutions at one point (when Holmes appeared to attempt the black arts in desperation), but I should have had more faith.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Sherlock Holmes (2009)
- 27/12/2009 11:19:03 PM
2227 Views
Question, which probably will require a spoiler, but I don't care
- 28/12/2009 11:38:37 AM
982 Views
I reveal no spoilers, but ask an obvious question...
- 29/12/2009 07:06:11 AM
996 Views
Re: I reveal no spoilers, but ask an obvious question...
- 29/12/2009 11:26:32 AM
967 Views
I believe it is a convention of the rhetorical question that an answer is not actually invited.
*NM*
- 30/12/2009 11:15:09 AM
553 Views
*NM*
- 30/12/2009 11:15:09 AM
553 Views
I would watch a sequel. Make a sequel, peoples! *NM*
- 28/12/2009 10:54:53 PM
618 Views
It made it's budget back in the opening weekend. I'd say a sequel is innevitable now. *NM*
- 29/12/2009 05:00:18 PM
561 Views
Well they were shamelessly plugging a sequel in the last 5 minutes, so I expected no less
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
524 Views
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
524 Views
It's interesting (possible spoilers?)
- 30/12/2009 12:23:29 AM
927 Views
It's a good one. If you only have the budget for one movie, pick this one over Avatar.
- 29/12/2009 07:04:59 AM
924 Views
Funny you should say that...we saw this movie today, chosen over Avatar.
*NM*
- 03/01/2010 09:12:07 AM
631 Views
*NM*
- 03/01/2010 09:12:07 AM
631 Views
Just saw this tonight. It might well be one of the only good movies released in 2009.
- 01/01/2010 05:55:48 AM
919 Views
You mean judged by the movies you decided not to go and see? *NM*
- 01/01/2010 03:15:56 PM
571 Views
Well it would be hard to judge it any other way.
- 01/01/2010 04:35:27 PM
1006 Views
What happened to giving stuff a chance?
- 02/01/2010 01:58:38 AM
948 Views
Re: How happened to giving stuff a chance?
- 02/01/2010 05:51:44 AM
898 Views
Having seen it *spoilers*
- 04/01/2010 10:44:35 PM
959 Views
I watched it New Year's Eve.
- 05/01/2010 02:22:58 PM
956 Views
too many things were explained that did not need explaining... i got bored. there was no suspense.
- 10/01/2010 07:34:13 AM
812 Views

