I generally approve. There were a few things that irked me, but I won't object too much.
I wish they could have resisted using Irene Adler as a romantic foil, and the deductions Watson makes from the watch is lifted from a book where Holmes make them in order to astonish Watson.
Also Holmes is always described as impeccably dressed (unless dressing to hide who he is).
None of these were fatal, though. I am not convinced it was entirely Sherlock Holmes, but it was an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud quite a lot.
I confess I doubted they would stick to the rational solutions at one point (when Holmes appeared to attempt the black arts in desperation), but I should have had more faith.
I wish they could have resisted using Irene Adler as a romantic foil, and the deductions Watson makes from the watch is lifted from a book where Holmes make them in order to astonish Watson.
Also Holmes is always described as impeccably dressed (unless dressing to hide who he is).
None of these were fatal, though. I am not convinced it was entirely Sherlock Holmes, but it was an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud quite a lot.
I confess I doubted they would stick to the rational solutions at one point (when Holmes appeared to attempt the black arts in desperation), but I should have had more faith.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Sherlock Holmes (2009)
- 27/12/2009 11:19:03 PM
2290 Views
Question, which probably will require a spoiler, but I don't care
- 28/12/2009 11:38:37 AM
1066 Views
I reveal no spoilers, but ask an obvious question...
- 29/12/2009 07:06:11 AM
1066 Views
Re: I reveal no spoilers, but ask an obvious question...
- 29/12/2009 11:26:32 AM
1037 Views
I believe it is a convention of the rhetorical question that an answer is not actually invited.
*NM*
- 30/12/2009 11:15:09 AM
579 Views
*NM*
- 30/12/2009 11:15:09 AM
579 Views
I would watch a sequel. Make a sequel, peoples! *NM*
- 28/12/2009 10:54:53 PM
652 Views
It made it's budget back in the opening weekend. I'd say a sequel is innevitable now. *NM*
- 29/12/2009 05:00:18 PM
590 Views
Well they were shamelessly plugging a sequel in the last 5 minutes, so I expected no less
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
559 Views
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
559 Views
It's interesting (possible spoilers?)
- 30/12/2009 12:23:29 AM
994 Views
It's a good one. If you only have the budget for one movie, pick this one over Avatar.
- 29/12/2009 07:04:59 AM
1005 Views
Funny you should say that...we saw this movie today, chosen over Avatar.
*NM*
- 03/01/2010 09:12:07 AM
663 Views
*NM*
- 03/01/2010 09:12:07 AM
663 Views
Just saw this tonight. It might well be one of the only good movies released in 2009.
- 01/01/2010 05:55:48 AM
986 Views
You mean judged by the movies you decided not to go and see? *NM*
- 01/01/2010 03:15:56 PM
605 Views
Well it would be hard to judge it any other way.
- 01/01/2010 04:35:27 PM
1079 Views
What happened to giving stuff a chance?
- 02/01/2010 01:58:38 AM
1010 Views
Re: How happened to giving stuff a chance?
- 02/01/2010 05:51:44 AM
969 Views
Having seen it *spoilers*
- 04/01/2010 10:44:35 PM
1028 Views
I watched it New Year's Eve.
- 05/01/2010 02:22:58 PM
1025 Views
too many things were explained that did not need explaining... i got bored. there was no suspense.
- 10/01/2010 07:34:13 AM
883 Views

