Active Users:409 Time:01/05/2025 11:27:12 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM
One was a respectably accurate retelling of political turmoil, with a few embellishments where sources aren't revealing about characters. The other was a complete fabrication tenuously based on a battle.

This looks like the latter, which is very unfortunate. :(
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Spartacus: Blood and Sand starts this week...on Starz...but who's going to watch? Arok Manok's Astral Projection - 19/01/2010 12:07:46 AM 639 Views
It sounds cool ... too bad I only have basic cable. Darth_Katie - 19/01/2010 01:15:54 AM 459 Views
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence. Ghavrel - 19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM 468 Views
You are mistaken. Both films/shows were close to their source material.. Arok Manok's Astral Projection - 19/01/2010 02:29:00 AM 481 Views
I am not mistaken. The assumption that the source material is correct is inane. Ghavrel - 19/01/2010 05:23:20 AM 562 Views
The source of 300 is the graphic novel, not history ironclad - 19/01/2010 11:35:59 AM 510 Views
And the graphic novels gets its source material/distorts its source material from where? The Shrike - 19/01/2010 04:58:30 PM 491 Views
The question is what the film aimed to be ironclad - 19/01/2010 07:45:18 PM 492 Views
It aimed to be shit. And it succeeded. The Shrike - 19/01/2010 10:55:57 PM 479 Views
And, as I said, that places it in a much lower league of quality than ROME, which was very accurate. *NM* Ghavrel - 20/01/2010 04:17:57 AM 208 Views
You do realize that the Graphic Novel is a work of fiction, right? MightyYT - 20/01/2010 05:24:27 PM 467 Views
Golly, gee! I never knew! Thanks for all that. *NM* The Shrike - 20/01/2010 11:56:59 PM 211 Views
300 is deliberately supposed to be non-historical, but this message got lost somewhere along the way Werthead - 21/01/2010 01:47:50 AM 494 Views
That was such a stupid potential argument that I gave him the benefit of the doubt and discarded it. Ghavrel - 20/01/2010 04:17:10 AM 451 Views
Why are you guys getting so worked up about this? ironclad - 20/01/2010 11:37:53 AM 453 Views
I enjoyed watching 300. Ghavrel - 20/01/2010 09:22:11 PM 486 Views
Sounds good, as long as it doesn't look like Xena or Hercules *NM* ironclad - 19/01/2010 11:34:23 AM 208 Views
How much skin does she show? *NM* Dark Knight - 19/01/2010 02:28:55 PM 208 Views
*points* the only relevant reply to this post *NM* MonCul - 20/01/2010 06:50:32 PM 224 Views
I'll watch it for the soft core porn value. Full frontal male nudity! The gays will love it. The Shrike - 19/01/2010 05:00:27 PM 476 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes