Active Users:624 Time:21/12/2025 05:07:23 PM
Great episode! Sir Tybalt Send a noteboard - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM
I missed the first couple of seconds of the show, but they were showing us pictures of Jack - was there a woman in there somewhere? Possibly the mother of Jack's son?

Sounds like Jacob knew Jack would trash the lighthouse all along. He's just nudging Jack along the path he needs to take.

Soooo, what happens now when Kate finds Claire and tells her she had Aaron this whole time? So long, Kate?

Can't wait for next week's episode!
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 876 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 542 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 527 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 609 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 627 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 524 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 558 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 578 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 543 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 196 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 592 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 517 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 476 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 531 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 567 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 503 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 499 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 506 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 504 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 494 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 521 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 574 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 559 Views

Reply to Message