Active Users:519 Time:02/05/2026 06:01:29 PM
I think Sanderson had to come up with the wind scene Ryan Send a noteboard - 05/09/2009 05:17:58 AM
Then when it switched to Rand I think we hit Jordan's rough draft, that was left predominantly alone.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers) - 05/09/2009 03:46:26 AM 1860 Views
It isn't supposed to be. - 05/09/2009 04:08:46 AM 963 Views
Jason claimed it was hard to tell them apart. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 410 Views
I take anything from that source with a pinch of salt *NM* - 05/09/2009 03:41:49 PM 383 Views
I noticed that too. - 05/09/2009 04:11:22 AM 808 Views
Re: This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers) - 05/09/2009 04:13:48 AM 1007 Views
Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:18:51 AM 1289 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:25:16 AM 1058 Views
That's what I meant by absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:31:26 AM 1071 Views
Could it be rough draft that Sanderson kept, and Jordan never polished? *NM* - 05/09/2009 05:14:59 AM 476 Views
I doubt it - 05/09/2009 05:17:09 AM 1130 Views
Definitely Sanderson - 05/09/2009 05:27:57 AM 1086 Views
Really? - 05/09/2009 08:55:37 AM 1111 Views
I agree with DomA *NM* - 05/09/2009 08:26:17 PM 476 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:39:55 AM 1216 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:53:12 AM 960 Views
I could tell it wasn't Jordan, but I liked what I read. - 05/09/2009 04:27:44 AM 797 Views
I liked it too...new WoT material finally! *NM* - 05/09/2009 05:16:34 AM 357 Views
It bugged me at first. - 05/09/2009 04:32:27 AM 882 Views
Yeah, I just finished reading it....and it was pretty obvious that it wasn't RJ - 05/09/2009 04:55:30 AM 879 Views
I think Sanderson had to come up with the wind scene - 05/09/2009 05:17:58 AM 894 Views
agreed. I liked it, but - 05/09/2009 05:13:18 AM 950 Views
Anyone want to guess which part can be a foreshadowing? - 05/09/2009 05:34:07 AM 908 Views
No surprise. Brandon was one of us when RJ stll lived *NM* - 08/09/2009 04:27:14 PM 379 Views
Nature of the beast. - 05/09/2009 06:21:05 AM 867 Views
Agreed... - 05/09/2009 06:45:09 AM 779 Views
No *sniffles* gave it away although N does tug her braid. - 05/09/2009 07:33:32 AM 816 Views
Becareful of what you wish for - 05/09/2009 08:29:52 AM 902 Views
I've been saying that for years. - 05/09/2009 08:55:19 AM 958 Views
Whatever. I thought it was an improvement. - 05/09/2009 08:45:37 PM 891 Views
Agree fully. Art and paiting have rarely even been mentioned! It feels like a fan's writing... - 05/09/2009 09:59:15 AM 1007 Views
Are you pre-ordering the book? - 05/09/2009 10:48:44 AM 870 Views
I live in the U.S. now... - 05/09/2009 02:59:40 PM 860 Views
I hope so, because I won't able to wait for it. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:45:01 PM 379 Views
I preordered it from Bookdepository.com for 15$ - 05/09/2009 04:47:07 PM 758 Views
I checked, they don't ship to India. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:50:34 PM 394 Views
Yes, I agree. It feels cold because it is an alien presence. - 09/09/2009 02:31:45 PM 764 Views
It sounds better via the audio - 05/09/2009 03:07:37 PM 907 Views
Re: It sounds better via the audio - 05/09/2009 03:41:27 PM 821 Views
No. It was never meant to be, it never could be and Sanderson never pretended otherwise. - 05/09/2009 07:40:37 PM 1015 Views
Exactly. - 05/09/2009 08:50:08 PM 846 Views
According to him... - 05/09/2009 09:14:44 PM 829 Views
It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan - 05/09/2009 11:11:58 PM 1088 Views
Re: It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan - 06/09/2009 12:19:11 AM 1092 Views
*NM* - 06/09/2009 12:24:16 AM 382 Views
I didn't read any of Anderson's books - 06/09/2009 12:17:54 PM 836 Views
Funniest thing ever posted on RAFO.com. Ever. *NM* - 07/09/2009 03:49:24 AM 514 Views
In it's week long history. Ever. EVER *NM* - 07/09/2009 08:12:44 AM 314 Views
It wasn't Jordan... - 07/09/2009 04:36:11 AM 791 Views
It isn't but I thought BS said he wasn't trying to be exactly like RJ - 08/09/2009 08:12:24 PM 867 Views
The difference was a bit staggering - 08/09/2009 08:23:15 PM 860 Views

Reply to Message