Active Users:316 Time:14/05/2024 07:41:09 PM
Harry Potter is a different story. It is more straightforward and fewer important characters. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 28/04/2010 02:18:32 PM
"Harry Potter"'s strength is that Rowling wrote a coming of age story that is told from a single POV and covers one major plotline per book. At the end of each book, except the last three, all the loose ends are tied up and there is a satisfying explanation for any outstanding questions or issues.

I don't think you can honestly compare it to "Wheel of Time". Even "The Lord of the Rings" is a more straightforward and more tightly plotted story than "The Wheel of Time", and tLotR is more complex than WoT is!
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
More on the WoT movies - 27/04/2010 05:41:00 PM 1325 Views
One movie per book? Let's hope this project dies. *NM* - 27/04/2010 05:59:20 PM 233 Views
Re: More on the WoT movies - 27/04/2010 06:24:42 PM 727 Views
A cable miniseries would be best *NM* - 27/04/2010 06:29:02 PM 287 Views
Re: A cable miniseries would NOT be best - 27/04/2010 06:40:40 PM 633 Views
Bah.... - 27/04/2010 07:27:29 PM 659 Views
LEGEND OF THE SEEKER was not a cable miniseries. - 28/04/2010 03:57:34 PM 951 Views
I don't think it's realistic either - 27/04/2010 07:16:33 PM 634 Views
An animated series would work. - 27/04/2010 09:51:23 PM 581 Views
agreed - 28/04/2010 01:43:36 AM 607 Views
Jordan rejected it. - 28/04/2010 04:01:10 PM 723 Views
Re: More on the WoT movies - 28/04/2010 02:00:44 AM 555 Views
Hoping for a Masterpiece, not another Eragon! - 28/04/2010 05:55:56 AM 605 Views
If they can make 8 Harrry Potter movies... - 28/04/2010 08:35:01 AM 570 Views
yep yep - 28/04/2010 01:21:21 PM 576 Views
Harry Potter is a different story. It is more straightforward and fewer important characters. - 28/04/2010 02:18:32 PM 585 Views

Reply to Message