Active Users:495 Time:14/12/2025 10:49:40 PM
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM
Is this text really authentic? If it is, the new bits about Perrin are interesting. Besides the WC, it seems there will be indeed another confrontation with Slayer (BS stated that Slayer will apear in ToM). But there also seems to be another "unseen foe" near Perrin. IMO, this could very well support my idea that Aran'gar (otherwise maybe Cyndane or Moghedien?) is now among Perrin's group and will try to manipulaze him (again via dreams liek she treid with Egwene) or eventually kill him.

However, the cover is certainly a fake, or?
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2355 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 1022 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1375 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 376 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 885 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 987 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 969 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 1015 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 1074 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 367 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 821 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 977 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 1099 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 458 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 1028 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 1061 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 1111 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 870 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 1129 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 854 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 1052 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 407 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 366 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 869 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 881 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 945 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 385 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 826 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 855 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 1068 Views

Reply to Message