Active Users:403 Time:01/05/2025 06:54:53 PM
Re: But... DomA Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM
How can the unseen foe be Slayer, if Slayer is explicitely mentioned one sentence before as one of the specters, who hunt Perrin?


I agree. That'd be repeating Slayer twice (almost in a row), and in the context it's clear Harriet want the "unseen threat" to be mysterious, so it wouldn't have done at all to remind us of Slayer right before if that was him.

I don't think "unseen" implies TAR necessarily either. To me in the context I think it implies Perrin isn't aware of the threat, or he can't find the source.

The way Harriet chose to mention Slayer along the wolves, it sounds like it's the fact Slayer is killing wolves that Perrin will have to deal with.

The only thing remotely interesting is that if Slayer tries to scout Perrin's camp as "Lord Luc" he's making a big mistake, with Basel "I worship the Andoran Royalty" Gill, Lini Eltring and Morgase there. They would know he's Luc Mantear right away. Perhaps Galad too, though he must have been really young when Luc vanished.
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2184 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 905 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1240 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 322 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 743 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 858 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 829 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 866 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 926 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 307 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 693 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 837 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 969 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 374 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 898 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 938 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 965 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 714 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 984 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 733 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 934 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 354 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 313 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 741 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 759 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 830 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 329 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 704 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 728 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 928 Views

Reply to Message