Active Users:392 Time:17/06/2025 12:23:25 AM
Re: But... DomA Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM
How can the unseen foe be Slayer, if Slayer is explicitely mentioned one sentence before as one of the specters, who hunt Perrin?


I agree. That'd be repeating Slayer twice (almost in a row), and in the context it's clear Harriet want the "unseen threat" to be mysterious, so it wouldn't have done at all to remind us of Slayer right before if that was him.

I don't think "unseen" implies TAR necessarily either. To me in the context I think it implies Perrin isn't aware of the threat, or he can't find the source.

The way Harriet chose to mention Slayer along the wolves, it sounds like it's the fact Slayer is killing wolves that Perrin will have to deal with.

The only thing remotely interesting is that if Slayer tries to scout Perrin's camp as "Lord Luc" he's making a big mistake, with Basel "I worship the Andoran Royalty" Gill, Lini Eltring and Morgase there. They would know he's Luc Mantear right away. Perhaps Galad too, though he must have been really young when Luc vanished.
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2202 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 918 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1255 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 326 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 759 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 872 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 843 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 881 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 942 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 311 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 708 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 852 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 982 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 379 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 919 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 956 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 983 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 726 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 1003 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 743 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 951 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 359 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 320 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 756 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 775 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 845 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 335 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 719 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 741 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 945 Views

Reply to Message