Active Users:733 Time:16/06/2026 04:37:00 PM
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar djwilson300 Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM
The windfinders played a significant role both in exposing what life for the mainlander channelers would be like chained, and creating a valid diversion for the entire Matt vs Tuon thread. I think the entire "bargain" turned out to be a fizzled plotline when the net result was spoiled food for the Domani and not much else. I can only hope when the last battle begins, the Sea Folk are called upon again to do something more productive. (Whats not to like about them...topless graceful women who have the best balance of power with the opposite sex than any other culture in the world...sign me up)
Reply to message
Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 04:35:17 PM 1431 Views
Double post - Ignore *NM* - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 331 Views
Re: Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 940 Views
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM 1021 Views
Oh right, the Amayar thing... hope Sanderson's careful about stuff like that. - 04/06/2010 01:41:53 AM 912 Views
Agreed - 04/06/2010 04:39:08 AM 813 Views
Oceanic shadowspawn - 04/06/2010 01:44:51 PM 877 Views
Re: Agreed - 04/06/2010 05:26:21 PM 775 Views
yes, actually that makes sense - 04/06/2010 09:43:45 PM 726 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:03 AM 439 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. Oops, Double post. MY BAD. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:04 AM 321 Views
Is it just me or did a bunch of double posts go missing? - 04/06/2010 10:50:09 PM 672 Views
Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 03:11:19 PM 760 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 04:51:24 PM 1019 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 06:58:05 PM 779 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 04:53:27 AM 757 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 05:53:43 AM 725 Views
Seanchan transport numbers - 05/06/2010 08:58:31 AM 688 Views

Reply to Message