Active Users:879 Time:07/08/2025 08:07:39 AM
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar djwilson300 Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM
The windfinders played a significant role both in exposing what life for the mainlander channelers would be like chained, and creating a valid diversion for the entire Matt vs Tuon thread. I think the entire "bargain" turned out to be a fizzled plotline when the net result was spoiled food for the Domani and not much else. I can only hope when the last battle begins, the Sea Folk are called upon again to do something more productive. (Whats not to like about them...topless graceful women who have the best balance of power with the opposite sex than any other culture in the world...sign me up)
Reply to message
Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 04:35:17 PM 1176 Views
Double post - Ignore *NM* - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 276 Views
Re: Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 819 Views
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM 838 Views
Oh right, the Amayar thing... hope Sanderson's careful about stuff like that. - 04/06/2010 01:41:53 AM 768 Views
Agreed - 04/06/2010 04:39:08 AM 684 Views
Oceanic shadowspawn - 04/06/2010 01:44:51 PM 745 Views
Re: Agreed - 04/06/2010 05:26:21 PM 648 Views
yes, actually that makes sense - 04/06/2010 09:43:45 PM 603 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:03 AM 374 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. Oops, Double post. MY BAD. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:04 AM 255 Views
Is it just me or did a bunch of double posts go missing? - 04/06/2010 10:50:09 PM 554 Views
Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 03:11:19 PM 631 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 04:51:24 PM 844 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 06:58:05 PM 627 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 04:53:27 AM 626 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 05:53:43 AM 576 Views
Seanchan transport numbers - 05/06/2010 08:58:31 AM 579 Views

Reply to Message