Active Users:722 Time:26/06/2025 05:53:29 PM
I disagree Etzel Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 08:25:13 AM
Actually, I agree with the idea that we may get an overlapping moment in ToM that brings Graendal back, briefly. BS suggested as much. And I really love the idea that this leads to Arangar bringing down Mesaana. I think it's logical and would read well on the page.


If Graendal died in the end of TGS, it would be completely untypical and confusing for the series, to bring a character who died back in a previous scene. BS also just said that Graendal will be "mentioned" in the book. What BS obviously meant with the overlapping timelines is that he will show us what happened e.g. in Perrin's or Mat's timelines, which aren't at advanced as Rand's (and Graendal's) or Egwene's timeline.

It's also wrong that Graendal and Aran'gar have a close alliance. They just call it an "association", which apparently means that they exchange some informations once in a while, not closely working together. Aran'gar e.g. still doesn't know where Graendal's lair is in the beginning of TGS, as Graendal tells.

DomA's idea makes total sense - a BA comes into the Little Tower and reveals a weave never seen before, and it's a weave that could be used to root out Arangar! If you remember, Mesaana was angry at Arangar for Egwene's capture; Messy was sure that the rebellion would collapse. So not only is Arangar suddenly much less useful, but Arangar is the only other person who can really tamper with Mesaana's AS power base. It makes a lot of sense to just oust Arangar from the place, if not remove her from competition outright. And all Mesaana has to do is show her BA servants an AoL weave...


It doesn't make much sense, considering that both, Aran'gar & Mesaana, are basically working together to unstable the AS. This is also supervised by Moridin and likely SH. That saidin was undetected to kill the AS was rather wanted to suggest that Rand and the Asha'man are behind it to spoil any talks.

RJ must've had a point in showing us that Arangar learns Mesaana's location from Graendal. Graendal also has vast contacts, so it makes sense that this super-smart woman could puzzle it out. It all fits.


Aran'gar already knew that Mesaana is in the WT. In TGS, prologue, Graendal apparently didn't know who Mesaana is exactly. Considering that she had other more urgent tasks regarding Rand on her mind now, it's unlikely that she cared about Mesaana's identity at all.

Etzel, however, is definitely 100% right on Arangar's murder victims. Both women were killed with saidin, remember?


Indeed.
Reply to message
Egwene's future - 08/06/2010 10:10:28 AM 1171 Views
The headsman's axe might also be merely metaphorical. *NM* - 08/06/2010 11:25:52 AM 171 Views
Yes, could be... - 08/06/2010 01:36:08 PM 345 Views
I've wondered if Egwene is "The Andoran Candidate" - 08/06/2010 04:07:18 PM 410 Views
I rather think Aran'gar was a failure... - 09/06/2010 10:56:42 AM 271 Views
Finally found a quote to redeem the Forsaken a bit - 09/06/2010 03:53:37 PM 266 Views
Yeah, it's a bit strange... - 09/06/2010 04:09:48 PM 251 Views
Agreed - 09/06/2010 04:26:27 PM 231 Views
I think the DO's power is generated off of Chaos - 10/06/2010 01:21:56 PM 219 Views
Re: Yeah, it's a bit strange... - 09/06/2010 07:15:41 PM 234 Views
That is obvious, but... - 09/06/2010 08:25:16 PM 203 Views
Re: That is obvious, but... - 10/06/2010 05:13:50 PM 342 Views
More thoughts in defense of this idea - 09/06/2010 10:30:14 PM 224 Views
I think Aran'gar rather planned... - 10/06/2010 08:37:35 AM 250 Views
Re: More thoughts in defense of this idea - 10/06/2010 01:26:54 PM 236 Views
Aran'gar certainly isn't Taim - 10/06/2010 02:15:40 PM 218 Views
It's not my theory... I do think it would be hilarious though - 10/06/2010 02:44:57 PM 237 Views
Implausible - 10/06/2010 02:50:51 PM 222 Views
I mean... - 10/06/2010 03:20:41 PM 194 Views
I still think yet another clue speaks loudly that Taim is a real Forsaken - 10/06/2010 04:04:06 PM 210 Views
RJ explained Taim's look at the beginning of LoC - 10/06/2010 04:25:54 PM 289 Views
Personally I think RJ was full of sh*t with that comment - 11/06/2010 01:20:25 PM 226 Views
Indeed - 12/06/2010 08:27:16 AM 228 Views
Exactly! - 12/06/2010 01:02:53 PM 218 Views
Re: I mean... - 11/06/2010 01:23:28 PM 190 Views
Re: Implausible - 10/06/2010 06:44:01 PM 249 Views
Mesaana's more likely. There just isn't enough time for it to be the Seanchan, imo *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:31:07 PM 106 Views
On the other hand, we know that Egwene has to meet Seanchan yet. *NM* - 09/06/2010 10:51:37 AM 105 Views
In book time, she'll probably be seeing Seta (and possibly Egeanin) in a couple hours - 09/06/2010 11:09:08 AM 235 Views
They are in Caemlyn now... - 09/06/2010 11:45:02 AM 277 Views
I didn't say it was important - 09/06/2010 11:56:44 AM 217 Views
I mean... - 09/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 271 Views
not going to happen - 09/06/2010 09:10:16 PM 237 Views
Well, I agree that Egwene won't die... - 09/06/2010 09:29:32 PM 239 Views
Ya, I could see that *NM* - 09/06/2010 09:50:58 PM 91 Views
well it could shut Romanda and Lelaine up - 10/06/2010 01:28:51 PM 236 Views
I agree,,, - 10/06/2010 06:17:59 PM 256 Views
Egwene's dreams are symbolic - 09/06/2010 01:05:24 AM 515 Views
one little caveat - 09/06/2010 01:16:09 AM 242 Views
But... - 09/06/2010 11:13:24 AM 212 Views
Re: But... - 09/06/2010 04:00:05 PM 229 Views
Yeah... - 09/06/2010 04:12:11 PM 229 Views
Some are more literal, while some are more symbolic - 09/06/2010 10:51:09 AM 228 Views
Re: Some are more literal, while some are more symbolic - 09/06/2010 06:54:14 PM 275 Views
As you said... - 09/06/2010 08:33:13 PM 197 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 12:23:02 AM 241 Views
I disagree - 10/06/2010 08:25:13 AM 242 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 09:45:05 PM 255 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 08:32:12 PM 224 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 09:14:25 PM 200 Views
Re: As you said... - 10/06/2010 11:40:52 PM 246 Views
So... - 11/06/2010 08:46:41 AM 247 Views
Re: So... - 11/06/2010 02:37:28 PM 219 Views
as I just noted above - 11/06/2010 03:26:21 PM 235 Views
Re: as I just noted above - 11/06/2010 05:00:23 PM 248 Views
Well - 13/06/2010 10:58:04 AM 194 Views
LOL - 11/06/2010 09:28:28 AM 171 Views
I agree - 11/06/2010 10:13:47 AM 226 Views
Re: I agree - 12/06/2010 08:31:04 AM 259 Views
"I think" - 12/06/2010 11:56:19 AM 170 Views
Nesta was impaled on a stake and her head put on a spike for rebellion - 10/06/2010 01:44:53 PM 290 Views
A new bit by BS - 22/06/2010 01:30:27 PM 243 Views

Reply to Message