Active Users:600 Time:17/03/2026 05:06:58 PM
Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/06/2010 01:09:11 PM
"Two hands. One to destroy, the other to save. Which had he lost?"

In the end of the book, one could say he "lost" the hand to destroy, namely the male Choedan Kal.

Besides that, one could also say that Taim was Rand's "hand" at the BT. It's clear that he will lose him alongside Taim's ca. 100 cronies.

Finally, Rand might also lose parts of his empire to the Shadow or the Seanchan.

Of course, the reason for the hand losing was to make Rand more like the Norse God Tyr.
Reply to message
The Dragon is one with the land, and the land is one with the Dragon - 13/06/2010 04:37:09 AM 1676 Views
The hand - 13/06/2010 05:02:51 AM 880 Views
Could have something to do with Mat or Perrin - 13/06/2010 05:12:19 AM 849 Views
Re: Could have something to do with Mat or Perrin - 13/06/2010 09:24:51 AM 770 Views
Maybe the wounds indicate that they all need to work together. *NM* - 15/06/2010 02:28:25 AM 471 Views
My own "maybe" - 13/06/2010 06:37:43 AM 894 Views
Re: The Dragon is one with the land, and the land is one with the Dragon - 13/06/2010 07:53:00 AM 895 Views
You're no fun - 13/06/2010 08:39:10 AM 941 Views
hrmm - 14/06/2010 03:01:33 AM 760 Views
Re: You're no fun - 14/06/2010 07:11:53 PM 812 Views
wound not related to Taim or Masema - 14/06/2010 08:42:16 PM 805 Views
Re: wound not related to Taim or Masema - 14/06/2010 10:52:09 PM 1025 Views
Re: wound not related to Taim or Masema - 15/06/2010 12:19:20 AM 761 Views
I agree. - 14/06/2010 10:24:04 PM 721 Views
'half the light of the world to save the world" *NM* - 14/06/2010 04:05:43 AM 1251 Views
Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand - 14/06/2010 01:09:11 PM 868 Views
Re: Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand - 14/06/2010 07:40:04 PM 860 Views
According to Crossroads of Twilight... - 14/06/2010 11:40:07 PM 721 Views
Not really an answer to your post... - 14/06/2010 11:48:06 PM 779 Views
But I completely agree. - 15/06/2010 01:40:45 AM 816 Views

Reply to Message