Active Users:400 Time:18/06/2025 12:58:53 AM
Re: First chapters: How do they stack up? ajfurst Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 04:44:20 AM
All in all, and getting serious here, folks (assuming your sarcasm detectors have not been reduced to smoldering circuitry by now), I think anyone who is disappointed with any perceived lack of action or significant events in "Tears of Steel" can just shut their pieholes. WoT is the quintessential old dog, and will not be learning any new "first chapter excitement" tricks anytime soon. It's less than fifty days until we get to read chapter two, so stop fussing.

Love,
Cannoli


Well put.

If I was rating first chapters of WOT books on the criteria of action that happens in that chapter (not someone has/will arrive so the next chapter will have action) and/or information imparted to the reader, then The Shadow Rising would be a clear top (and that's a special case with no prologue) with Tears of Steel in the top 3 or 4 (I'd rate it a clear no. 2, with everything that's brought up to speed plus the new points of debate).
Reply to message
First chapters: How do they stack up? - 08/09/2009 02:34:31 AM 725 Views
LOL. Hear hear. Though, a lot of work for a simple point. *NM* - 08/09/2009 02:50:54 AM 187 Views
But for many, probably necessary. A job well done, IMO. *NM* - 10/09/2009 09:32:08 PM 404 Views
High Chasaline (ACOS) is (imo) the most useless first chapter by far - 08/09/2009 04:03:30 AM 455 Views
Re: First chapters: How do they stack up? - 08/09/2009 04:44:20 AM 464 Views
The action will be in the prologue... it always is *NM* - 08/09/2009 05:25:09 AM 176 Views
Yeah, but some people haven't figured that out. - 08/09/2009 02:27:51 PM 449 Views
Love, Cannoli? God man... - 08/09/2009 05:33:32 AM 557 Views
Squeezing in all the sarcasm I can - 08/09/2009 02:28:35 PM 1074 Views
Not bad. Very thorough. *NM* - 08/09/2009 04:06:55 PM 163 Views

Reply to Message