Active Users:1637 Time:19/09/2026 07:59:58 AM
As said... Etzel Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 03:56:20 PM
But two Forsaken at the same place, namely Demandred and Osan'gar, doesn't make real sense.


Why not? Mesaana may be the 'White Tower' Forsaken, but Lanfear and even Graendal were continuously hatching their own plots from that base. Demandred has his finger in many pies, as DomA said. It's not as if he's competing with Osan'gar in that area.


Demandred likely has spies among the AM and might use DF there occasionally, but he certainly doesn't control the BT. Basically just the 100 cronies are truly on Taim's side. It's quite laughable that Demandred would be proud to control these 100 channelers, if he likely commanded tens of thousands channelers in the AoL, and especially if he provided Rand with 400-500 channelers at the same time. Besides that, Demandred was a politician and General of trained troops, not a trainer or teacher himself. It's hard to imagine that someone like Demandred had the motivation or patience to train other channelers. Therefore Demandred is not even needed at the BT. Finally, the notion that the secretive Demandred ordered to paint the fist symbol on Taim's palace is simply ludicrous; he had to fear that other Forsaken or Rand/LTT might recognize it, thus it makes no sense for him to show it. It's rather likely that Taim learned about it in Ishy's lessons and considered it appropiate. Also, no Forsaken comments that the AM are built or trained like army channelers in the AoL.
This message last edited by Etzel on 07/07/2010 at 03:57:38 PM
Reply to message
If Demandred isn't Roedran (or controlling Roedran) - 07/07/2010 10:08:19 AM 1791 Views
Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:31:33 AM 865 Views
Re: Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:46:31 AM 727 Views
Yeah... - 07/07/2010 11:03:21 AM 770 Views
Re: Yeah... - 07/07/2010 12:58:04 PM 874 Views
The thing is... - 07/07/2010 01:30:11 PM 710 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 03:24:34 PM 622 Views
As said... - 07/07/2010 03:56:20 PM 674 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 04:27:11 PM 617 Views
I think - 08/07/2010 09:00:46 AM 741 Views
It all began.... - 07/07/2010 11:49:39 AM 929 Views
The idea is... - 07/07/2010 12:39:19 PM 717 Views
No, Etzel... - 07/07/2010 01:03:20 PM 770 Views
I disagree... - 07/07/2010 01:18:11 PM 683 Views
And besides... - 07/07/2010 01:49:04 PM 683 Views
Fain and Slayer - 07/07/2010 08:47:48 PM 661 Views
Fain playing a significant role in the LB would too much allude to LotR, IMO. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:28:29 PM 659 Views
As would Moiraine returning. - 08/07/2010 02:13:25 AM 722 Views
It depends on Fain's role... - 08/07/2010 08:34:27 AM 569 Views
But what does "wildcard" really mean? - 08/07/2010 03:19:16 PM 595 Views
for a long time i thought shara and their tattooed channeles. - 09/07/2010 05:24:16 PM 592 Views
Fain doesn't make sense from a timing stand point - 07/07/2010 04:46:00 PM 641 Views
Indeed... - 08/07/2010 08:42:45 AM 603 Views
agreed - 09/07/2010 05:56:23 PM 551 Views
One reason the Murandy-New SL theory makes sense... - 07/07/2010 07:19:56 PM 587 Views
That's most likely just coincidence. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:30:00 PM 288 Views
Riiiight... because WoT is chock full of coincidences. - 08/07/2010 02:12:47 AM 577 Views
In any case... - 08/07/2010 08:31:19 AM 616 Views
Re: That's most likely just coincidence. - 08/07/2010 02:13:36 AM 591 Views
They followed Fain all the way to Caemlyn and shot arrows at Rand - 08/07/2010 04:21:14 AM 562 Views
Yeah, I agree, Roedran isn't under Fain's control. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:38:15 AM 376 Views
Re: It all began.... - 08/07/2010 12:11:02 PM 580 Views
Murandy just doesn't fit Demandred. Also, Sammael could have been wrong. - 07/07/2010 07:57:19 PM 864 Views
Here's another possibility - 08/07/2010 02:21:25 AM 662 Views
Another possibility for Demandred - 08/07/2010 03:20:27 AM 574 Views
What if Demandred's base is... - 08/07/2010 04:52:40 AM 609 Views
my problem with this - 08/07/2010 04:59:35 AM 598 Views
Well, I tend to agree with you - 09/07/2010 12:27:04 AM 547 Views
I doubt that you could that easily control the Madmen. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:44:42 AM 262 Views
Unlikely... maybe even impossible - 08/07/2010 10:14:24 AM 590 Views
Definitely possible. - 08/07/2010 02:06:57 PM 592 Views
Now here's a man with... vision! - 09/07/2010 12:24:13 AM 563 Views
not really - 10/07/2010 12:25:31 PM 565 Views
That's factually incorrect - 12/07/2010 12:41:48 AM 626 Views
yes, factually incorrect by you - 12/07/2010 08:02:23 AM 647 Views
- 12/07/2010 04:40:45 PM 568 Views
I think Lanfears' estimation is incorrect. - 13/07/2010 04:15:44 PM 577 Views

Reply to Message