Active Users:472 Time:16/06/2026 07:37:12 PM
In RJ's explanation... Etzel Send a noteboard - 21/07/2010 02:32:03 PM
About the whole balefire-transmigration issue - which RJ explains in pretty detailed words - he never mentions or indicates that distance to SG plays any role. If that would play a role, it's not understandable why RJ didn't mention it in this context, because that wouldn't give anything away. He just says (and this was new information, not revealed in the books) that if a very small amount is used, the DO can theoretically still transmigrate someone. If one reads this answer one has to assume that distance to SG doesn't play any role but just the amount of balefire, because the DO can also otherwise obviously transmigrate Forsaken everywhere in the world; at least the Forsaken never mentioned that they are only "immortal", if they don't die too far away from SG (and in the end of TFoH, the DO's powers on all of the Westlands were anway very much grown, as seen by the unnatural weather). In the same way, I could claim that it plays a role concerning transmigration if you are a man or a women, if you are balefired with a very small amount of balefire, though there isn't any indication in this Q&A that this would be the case. Basically, the idea that distance to SG would be in any way important for the transmigration of a balefired person, is just unsupported speculation.

RJ and BS mention a few other RAFO limits and circumstances of death, except for balefire, which can prevent transmigration and weren't revealed yet. That can hardly mean a death too far away from SG, because following your logic, one would almost always be too far away from SG, and that is something already shown in the books.
Reply to message
The limits of transmigration - 21/07/2010 12:34:20 PM 1342 Views
The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 21/07/2010 12:51:48 PM 984 Views
Can't be right - 21/07/2010 01:09:36 PM 954 Views
I don't understand what you're saying here... - 21/07/2010 01:19:13 PM 1012 Views
I disagree... - 21/07/2010 01:49:36 PM 883 Views
I think you're going off on a slight tangent here... - 21/07/2010 02:04:30 PM 983 Views
In RJ's explanation... - 21/07/2010 02:32:03 PM 877 Views
THOSE WHO BETRAY ME DIE THE FINAL DEATH! - 22/07/2010 03:30:57 AM 889 Views
Re: The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 21/07/2010 02:41:58 PM 924 Views
When I said distance, think of it as "radius" and the no. of threads within that radius... - 21/07/2010 02:57:57 PM 965 Views
OK, I understand ... - 21/07/2010 03:24:34 PM 934 Views
Yes, Pattern proximity, rather than physical proximity... - 21/07/2010 03:37:15 PM 857 Views
Re: Yes, Pattern proximity, rather than physical proximity... - 21/07/2010 04:52:38 PM 877 Views
But as you said... - 21/07/2010 03:01:50 PM 853 Views
Re: But as you said... - 21/07/2010 03:35:51 PM 862 Views
As I understand you and Shannow... - 21/07/2010 03:49:38 PM 883 Views
Re: As I understand you and Shannow... - 21/07/2010 04:34:08 PM 931 Views
I think it's absurd to think relative distance to SG is a factor: - 21/07/2010 04:01:17 PM 1042 Views
Indeed... - 21/07/2010 04:29:28 PM 843 Views
Re: The EXACT anwer is easy to provide... - 22/07/2010 02:58:48 AM 868 Views
I don't think it was ever said that the DO had less Power in TAR - 21/07/2010 03:01:31 PM 820 Views
The idea is... - 21/07/2010 03:10:15 PM 882 Views
Hmmm, I'm not really sure if this holds true. - 21/07/2010 03:25:55 PM 834 Views
I would argue... - 21/07/2010 03:39:05 PM 865 Views
Re: I would argue... - 21/07/2010 03:59:53 PM 881 Views
Maybe death by the TP? - 21/07/2010 03:48:16 PM 868 Views
Would surprise me... - 21/07/2010 03:54:37 PM 865 Views
Re: Would surprise me... - 21/07/2010 04:01:08 PM 939 Views
Trying to mask yet another Slayer killed Asmodean argument are we? - 21/07/2010 06:21:57 PM 933 Views
Being grabbed by the Horn would be one. *NM* - 25/07/2010 07:12:17 AM 410 Views

Reply to Message