Active Users:559 Time:21/09/2024 01:26:19 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
That some time after Ishy's death, Sammael took control of Carridin. Serving his new master, certainly protected Carridin in a way. After all, Carridin wasn't immediately killed in LoC or ACoS, when SH and Moridin appeared, but not until after Sammael's death. He also wasn't killed in the way SH 0.5. threatened him, namely being tortured for years at SG, but rather quickly. Besides that, SH 0.5. gave the command to kill Rand, and we know that Moridin didn't want that after he was transmigrated.
Sammaels protection was bogus! Sammael protecting an insect? Ha! Sammael could care less.

And for all we know, Carridin could have been taken to Shayol Ghul still. If Shai'tan can catch Souls/ Minds to Transmigrate, why couldn't he catch Carridins dirty Darkfriend Soul to torture for all eternity and-then-some.
Reminds me of that burned darkfriend dying in TEotW looking hapilly untill the very last second in TAR.
Reminds me of the fire in the hearth at Shayol Ghul; all those tormented faces!

Besides, it's irrelevant if the promise is kept to the letter;
When Ishamael died, the killing stopped for 2 months.
The fact remains, no matter how much you clutter it with additional stuff..
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'

Death dances in my footsteps....
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1511 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 897 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 811 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 784 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 622 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 829 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 726 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 929 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 772 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1065 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 822 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 914 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 780 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 817 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 816 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 765 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 863 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 726 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 953 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 993 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 677 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 795 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 771 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 735 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 806 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 659 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 608 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 726 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 740 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 845 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 679 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 831 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 769 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 817 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 695 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 389 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 892 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 735 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 813 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 774 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 665 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 626 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 833 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 697 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 612 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 648 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 643 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 663 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 714 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 748 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 558 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 813 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 679 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 614 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 839 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 681 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 584 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 881 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes