Active Users:712 Time:17/03/2026 09:44:09 AM
Did he? Etzel Send a noteboard - 30/07/2010 01:16:43 PM
I couldn't find that quote in the Theoryland database.

However, the TP and the taint are obviously closely linked. But I would also argue that both things are in a way a bit different. The TP was rather the means of how the tainting could be done. Thus, the taint is a result/effect of the TP - perhaps partly corrupted saidin - like the area, where the Blight is now, was corrupted by the TP, but the Blight isn't the TP itself.

If one compares the TP and the taint, taking the TP is described as a most glorious feeling, while the taint is basically rancid oil. If the taint were "pure TP", it should mean that male channelers could have channeled the TP by just taking the taint, which apparently wasn't possible. And the male Forsaken had filters against the taint, but could still take the TP.

Therefore I would agree that one can say that taint and TP aren't exactly the same.
Reply to message
Again some little infos by BS - 30/07/2010 09:02:39 AM 1553 Views
Re: Again some little infos by BS - 30/07/2010 12:42:04 PM 974 Views
Did he? - 30/07/2010 01:16:43 PM 873 Views
I've noticed that notes from these Q&As aren't consistent. - 30/07/2010 03:29:16 PM 709 Views
That's right of course - 30/07/2010 04:04:29 PM 779 Views
Re: That's right of course - 30/07/2010 04:12:49 PM 629 Views
I don't remember that - 30/07/2010 04:38:57 PM 841 Views
Well, I do - 31/07/2010 12:09:29 AM 699 Views
post-WH signing? - 31/07/2010 01:59:36 AM 754 Views
Disappointing. Also, he's been practicing Aes Sedai-ish answers. - 30/07/2010 03:23:51 PM 879 Views
These are some pretty lame questions. *NM* - 30/07/2010 04:16:50 PM 395 Views

Reply to Message