Active Users:478 Time:02/05/2025 04:53:56 PM
That's right of course Etzel Send a noteboard - 30/07/2010 04:04:29 PM
I've been in contact with enough fans to notice that some fans' notes are more detailed than others, and some of them are outright wrong. They aren't necessarily transcripts, so there is a lot of room for error and it seems to me that quite a few details that are significant to readers really wasn't much concern to RJ, so some fans place emphasis on answers that were really tongue-in-cheek responses.


There are some inconsistencies and errors in the reports. Therefore a direct post or official interview by the authors is naturally the most trustworthy source (though RJ & BS also made a few mistakes). However, if I have no special reason to doubt it, I would usually believe in what other fans report.
Reply to message
Again some little infos by BS - 30/07/2010 09:02:39 AM 1463 Views
Re: Again some little infos by BS - 30/07/2010 12:42:04 PM 897 Views
Did he? - 30/07/2010 01:16:43 PM 787 Views
I've noticed that notes from these Q&As aren't consistent. - 30/07/2010 03:29:16 PM 611 Views
That's right of course - 30/07/2010 04:04:29 PM 689 Views
Re: That's right of course - 30/07/2010 04:12:49 PM 536 Views
I don't remember that - 30/07/2010 04:38:57 PM 749 Views
Well, I do - 31/07/2010 12:09:29 AM 616 Views
post-WH signing? - 31/07/2010 01:59:36 AM 668 Views
Disappointing. Also, he's been practicing Aes Sedai-ish answers. - 30/07/2010 03:23:51 PM 793 Views
These are some pretty lame questions. *NM* - 30/07/2010 04:16:50 PM 361 Views

Reply to Message