Active Users:572 Time:16/06/2026 02:54:05 PM
This is an excellent question. Nameless Ashaman Send a noteboard - 02/09/2010 10:05:17 PM
Sadly, I don't have the answer.

It is peculiar though, since their doesn't seem to be any environmental or sociological reason for humanity not to have grown in numbers and expanded back into the empty lands. All indications in the series are that conditions were very favourable for societal growth in the centuries preceding Rand's birth.

I wonder if RJ had an explanation for this or if it's just something he didn't think through.
Reply to message
Why is humanity receding? - 02/09/2010 07:10:11 PM 1739 Views
This is an excellent question. - 02/09/2010 10:05:17 PM 1287 Views
Thanks. - 02/09/2010 10:30:53 PM 1256 Views
I think there is mass ennuis and exhaustion - 02/09/2010 10:30:32 PM 1081 Views
Maybe... - 03/09/2010 12:20:08 AM 1069 Views
Re: Maybe... - 03/09/2010 03:00:25 PM 979 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 12:10:30 AM 1098 Views
I'm not sure. - 03/09/2010 12:23:00 AM 958 Views
Sometimes populations just declined - 03/09/2010 12:30:33 AM 1108 Views
I hadn't thought of that. - 03/09/2010 12:52:01 AM 1006 Views
Life conditions have been deteriorating gradually - 03/09/2010 02:06:03 AM 1267 Views
As a peasant, I am offended, but as fan of WoT, I like your analysis =P - 03/09/2010 05:34:55 PM 952 Views
Well - 03/09/2010 09:45:40 PM 993 Views
very nice analysis! I think you summed it up almost perfectly - 05/09/2010 04:56:11 PM 977 Views
Cities of old - 23/09/2010 10:43:35 AM 904 Views
The Taint - 03/09/2010 05:41:21 AM 933 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 08:56:42 AM 1072 Views
True. *NM* - 03/09/2010 06:57:25 PM 454 Views
Damn. Yeah, I had a much longer theory which basically said the same thing. - 04/09/2010 12:40:58 AM 1062 Views
BWB says Talidar was the culimination of a campaign with 7 major battles - 23/09/2010 06:16:19 AM 1101 Views

Reply to Message