Because how could anyone guarantee that those same weapons won't be used to kill other humans at some point. Darkfriends, at the very least.
The way the Oath is phrased, all you need is the intention that the weapon will not be used to kill men. And Aes Sedai have been getting over other Oaths often enough. Maybe they'll convince themselves they can confiscate all the weapons once the Last Battle is done.
Elayne+Aludra+Setalle= ter'angreal Dragons?
- 18/09/2010 04:38:11 AM
1609 Views
Re: Elayne+Aludra+Setalle= ter'angreal Dragons?
- 18/09/2010 06:40:13 AM
738 Views
I agree. She couldn't make them if she was oath bound. *NM*
- 18/09/2010 06:53:24 AM
257 Views
Read the Oaths again...
- 18/09/2010 03:25:52 PM
732 Views
Are they magical weapons that only kill Trollocs, then?
- 18/09/2010 03:46:52 PM
644 Views
That isn't needed...
- 18/09/2010 03:48:35 PM
695 Views
I don't know that it's that simple. A Sister who has taken the oaths may be able to do what Verin
- 18/09/2010 04:21:51 PM
706 Views
Yes, it's simply a matter of convincing herself that the dragon's will only ever be used against the
- 18/09/2010 03:47:07 PM
615 Views
I rather think
- 18/09/2010 08:45:26 PM
912 Views
Also her connection to Aviendha: that's why hers were the "right hands" to find the Bowl
- 19/09/2010 12:05:20 AM
668 Views
Re: Also her connection to Aviendha: that's why hers were the "right hands" to find the Bowl
- 19/09/2010 09:36:10 PM
934 Views