Active Users:300 Time:03/05/2024 03:57:15 PM
*shrugs* ... as I stated before I see the logic you are all pointing too ... it just doesn't seem darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 20/09/2010 09:48:02 PM
From the context it's pretty clear Min got a viewing of Rand showing that Moiraine is important to him and he would almost certainly fail without her. That viewing was very recent (it would be interesting to compare the timeline to see what Mat and Thom were up to around the same time Min mentionned this), not something Min had been sitting on for long.

It's a dire and hopeless viewing she chose not to tell Rand about.

Then she rationalizes this by adding there'd be no point in telling Rand, and then tried to convinced herself that viewing could be wrong, justifying that notion (very half-heartedly) by mentionning that one and only one of her viewings has failed, to her knowledge (one of Moiraine's). In other words, Min is lucid and sees there's not much hope and the odds this viewing will fail are bad and yet... perhaps there's more failed ones she doesn't know about, and this one might fail too, and "almost certainly" is not "certainly" either. So she wisely kept her loss of faith to herself, and kept her mouth shut (for once. Rand really didn't need to hear "you're almost doomed to fail anyway, you needed Moiraine and she died". Even less than Min he would have concluded: well, perhaps she isn't dead, then. Out of character for him).

The viewing that failed (most likely that about Moiraine and Thom) isn't terribly important. It's largely a plot device to shake Min's self-confidence in her viewings, when she was in a situation where she could have revealed too much. Min's talent was becoming an obstacle, so Jordan undermined it a bit. Her lost of confidence was necessary, otherwise Min being Min, she would have had to pester Rand about Moiraine not being dead, because she's had a viewing of her for the future and her viewings are absolute and never fail. Jordan didn't want the plot to go this way, Rand had to suffer and keep darkening from Moiraine' death, and not get involved with any plan to save her. Jordan had to come up with something that would remind the reader (not so) subtly Moiraine isn't dead, but that would fail to convince Min she is alive. So he had Min believe all the reports, and her self-confidence in her talent undermined from it.

Earlier on, he had include a first major "wrench" in the prophecies, by having the Finns reveal that it is possible to step outside the paths of "fate" (as Fain apparently managed to do) and to die. The prophecies then became something that will happen... if no one involved side-steps fate.

He went another step later on, and announced that Min's new viewings (and new dreams and foretellings) aren't certain like the older ones. What's set to happen is still set to happen, but the Wheel has lost some of its control over what remains to be woven of the future. That's a plot device so that prophecies are uncertain now. They no longer foreshadow only, they can turn into pure red herrings. Jordan's oracular talents in WOT were extremely useful to him earlier on, but toward the end, having increased and multiplied, he had to give a random/uncertain aspect to them or he'd be forced to stop using them as they would be too revealing at this point.

Now he can pepper the finale with new "prophecies" that could be right, only partly right, or turn out wrong, and twist our expectations. It's prophecies fitting for the third act, alonside the most obscure of the early ones (Sheriam's aura, Rand as a beggar and so on) that are now being fulfilled at last, while many of the more obvious are behind us by now.











right to me ... it won't shock me if you are correct here, I'm just not sold on why Min would have told Moiraine such information when she doesn't readily share the same information with anyone until Rand much later in the series.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
moiraine's three questions - 18/09/2010 12:21:52 AM 1526 Views
She knew he'd survive because Min told Moiraine they end up together, and they weren't a couple yet. - 18/09/2010 12:56:09 AM 668 Views
Can that really be right? - 18/09/2010 06:44:40 PM 805 Views
That is her "thimble of hope" that she mentions twice *NM* - 18/09/2010 07:41:23 PM 313 Views
Re: That is her "thimble of hope" that she mentions twice - 18/09/2010 08:19:03 PM 683 Views
She needs to have known that she would see Thom again - 18/09/2010 08:25:37 PM 623 Views
Re: She needs to have known that she would see Thom again - 18/09/2010 09:26:26 PM 653 Views
It doesn't change your point, but I know she hadn't entered the doorway yet. It was in this chapter - 18/09/2010 11:58:53 PM 541 Views
I'll take your word for it - 19/09/2010 06:10:43 AM 599 Views
You're misinterpreting which viewing is the one which Min believes turned out wrong. - 19/09/2010 03:33:04 AM 537 Views
???? - 19/09/2010 06:08:11 AM 674 Views
Wrong, she never specifies WHICH viewing was the wrong one. - 19/09/2010 07:28:21 AM 797 Views
No, you're the one who's wrong. - 19/09/2010 07:54:02 PM 579 Views
*shrugs* ... as I stated before I see the logic you are all pointing too ... it just doesn't seem - 20/09/2010 09:48:02 PM 700 Views
She doesn't have any reason to think that's wrong yet, though. - 20/09/2010 06:02:37 PM 718 Views
I'm going to make one last attempt before giving up - 20/09/2010 10:03:54 PM 626 Views
Yes, you're right - 21/09/2010 12:20:47 AM 535 Views
another interpretation (albeit, irrelevant to this discussion ) - 21/09/2010 04:55:30 AM 642 Views
If that fulfilled the viewing Min would never have said - 21/09/2010 05:07:34 AM 571 Views
it's likely - 18/09/2010 07:53:30 PM 731 Views
And she said the husband comment before going to the Aelfinn, and believed his survival back in EotW - 19/09/2010 12:15:26 AM 648 Views
Re: And she said the husband comment before going to the Aelfinn... - 19/09/2010 08:20:29 PM 726 Views
EotW p568 - 21/09/2010 05:22:23 PM 651 Views
She probably asked how to best guide and protect Rand - 19/09/2010 12:20:56 AM 756 Views
I tend to agree - 19/09/2010 07:08:50 PM 731 Views

Reply to Message