Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it.
Joel Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
Joel Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
An oath not to make weapons requires the person to know what a weapon is, and to think of whatever they're making as a weapon (or not). A crazy person who doesn't remember which weaves are weapons and which aren't, or who doesn't think of their weave as a weapon, would not be restricted by the oath, just like Aes Sedai can still tell a lie as long as in their minds they think it's true.
tl;dr, an oath on the rod requires a certain degree of cognizance to make it work, since the person's perceptions of their oath and their actions are what binds them.
tl;dr, an oath on the rod requires a certain degree of cognizance to make it work, since the person's perceptions of their oath and their actions are what binds them.
Good point though.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL?
- 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM
1027 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work
- 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM
753 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it.
- 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
639 Views
- 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
639 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM
638 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM
646 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM
612 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker.
- 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM
747 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different
- 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM
623 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while.
- 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM
604 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN?
- 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
695 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM*
- 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
257 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men?
- 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
613 Views
yes
- 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM
687 Views
Re: yes
- 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM
617 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
- 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM
620 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
- 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM
622 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM*
- 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM
319 Views
Doubtful
- 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM
625 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM*
- 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM
303 Views

*NM*