Active Users:627 Time:14/10/2025 05:27:14 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1007 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 734 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 614 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 619 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 624 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 588 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 271 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 584 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 723 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 600 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 576 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 614 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 671 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 671 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 240 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 247 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 283 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 247 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 594 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 683 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 659 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 595 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 600 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 601 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 306 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 604 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 291 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 596 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 613 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes