Active Users:334 Time:17/06/2025 04:49:17 PM
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
And why would Sammael tell a lie that they could disprove without his help? All they would have had to do is induce Rand to swear and prove him wrong, which would be fatal to his hopes to use them to get control over Rand for his purposes. If he did think it might work on Rand, he would never have given them the Rod for the same reason Graendal preemptively refuses to train Someryn. At the least he would have hedged it with BS proscriptions and conditions like he told them for the "nar'baha." He could have told them something like "the feedback/backlash will kill anyone nearby" or something similar to dissuade them from trying it. He would not have chanced Rand ending up in the control of others who had ways of getting in touch with him.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 968 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 700 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 584 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 252 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 547 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 687 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 564 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 540 Views
At least they can feel the True Source - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 574 Views
All true. - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 633 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 638 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 224 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 231 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 265 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 229 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 559 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 651 Views
yes - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 621 Views
Re: yes - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 558 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 566 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 564 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 290 Views
Doubtful - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 568 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 274 Views
Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 560 Views
Re: Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 581 Views

Reply to Message