Active Users:883 Time:01/02/2026 02:22:52 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin Send a noteboard - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
When the Wolf King carries the hammer, thus are the final days known. When the fox marries the raven, and the trumpets of battle are blown.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1047 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 768 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 659 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 662 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 661 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 631 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 286 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 619 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 770 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 640 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 629 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 657 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 718 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 708 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 259 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 262 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 299 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 262 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 634 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 719 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 700 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 633 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 637 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 635 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 327 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 646 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 309 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 640 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 657 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes