Active Users:2618 Time:24/10/2026 02:58:09 PM
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM
Seriously though we know that's not the case as Siuan and Leanne both reverted back to "prime child bearing year" when they were Stilled
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 1320 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 872 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 1044 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 360 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 957 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 1015 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 1082 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 817 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 774 Views
The answer is very simple. The WT discourages AS from having families as it distracts for being AS - 03/10/2010 01:08:30 AM 791 Views
OTOH, maybe they're all just post-menopausal *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:53:34 AM 366 Views
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM 726 Views
Which were their ages before they swore. - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM 772 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 773 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 805 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 776 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 854 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 335 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 335 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 351 Views

Reply to Message