Active Users:458 Time:29/10/2026 12:32:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe Send a noteboard - 07/10/2010 07:29:36 AM
Uniting seems likely, except for Taim and his croneys, but will the men take the 3 oaths?

Egwene was brought around to it by Suian after she intended to remove the 3 oaths forever.

It would seem a very unfair advantage that men would remain un oathed and all AS would stay oathed.

Thoughts?

Because compulsion wtich the oath rod is doesn't work on men holding the Power.

Huh? Where did you get the idea that compulsion with the oath rod doesnt work on men holding the power? That's never happened before.

I believe Graendal thinks it when Sammael gates in to one of ther first meatings in the books, but I can’t remember which book that happens in right now so I’ll have to look for it tomorrow.


Idk, never saw oath rod + man in any scene I can remember and I cant see how a man wouldnt be affected
Reply to message
Will the Black Tower & White Tower unite & if so will men take the 3 oaths? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:27:19 AM 1170 Views
Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Ava - 01/10/2010 08:21:26 AM 814 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Voscaia Sedai - 01/10/2010 09:55:42 AM 744 Views
the oaths do more harm than good Ava - 01/10/2010 01:56:12 PM 784 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:28:44 PM 732 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Ava - 02/10/2010 05:23:06 AM 726 Views
Which is why they need to pull their heads outta their butts and ditch the oaths altogether! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 02/10/2010 11:00:22 AM 353 Views
Yes to the first, but hopefully no to the second. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:13:25 AM 776 Views
Hopefully no, and it seems like the themes point against it. Cannoli - 01/10/2010 12:30:16 PM 960 Views
Disagree w/ respect to the Towers unifying Marshall - 02/10/2010 07:05:09 PM 745 Views
And look what happened to the AoL Cannoli - 02/10/2010 09:44:35 PM 905 Views
Wow, you have a lot to say lol malekithe - 03/10/2010 08:12:57 AM 842 Views
Also keep in mind that the symbols of saidin and saidar are not the ying and yang symbols RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/10/2010 04:28:50 PM 864 Views
And rightly so... MalkierKnight - 18/10/2010 05:28:39 AM 945 Views
Unify: yes, but not set themselves apart. Oaths: I don't think so. The Angry Druid - 07/10/2010 08:53:52 PM 738 Views
unite yes. if oaths then the men will have their own set. *NM* nigelgoboom - 03/10/2010 06:19:26 PM 353 Views
What oaths? malekithe - 04/10/2010 04:25:13 AM 742 Views
umm no nigelgoboom - 11/10/2010 01:25:35 PM 718 Views
Maybe the first, the second can't happen. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:45:10 AM 748 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe - 07/10/2010 06:27:02 AM 760 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 07:12:26 AM 763 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe - 07/10/2010 07:29:36 AM 710 Views
Sammael thinks that if he's holding the Power Graendal can't compel him darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 04:10:07 PM 827 Views
I hope not. And I think the 3 Oaths should go away, as well. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/10/2010 03:53:56 PM 745 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes