Active Users:315 Time:15/05/2024 10:19:27 AM
Almost certainly not. Do you have more that you wish to state about this theory? newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 16/10/2010 09:37:26 PM
He "shall slay his people with the sword of peace, and destroy them with the leaf."


It looks like it can't be the thing we missed, because Rand already "destroyed [his people] with the leaf" by telling the Aiel that they used to be peaceful - that they, in fact split off from the Tuathaan and betrayed their vow of non-violence. Why? Because the Tuathaan are associated with the Way of the Leaf. Also, this moment caused destruction in that many Aiel ran away from their families and lives. It caused havoc by making them question what they've always believed about themselves.

It seems to me that this same moment may also serve for counting as the "slay his people with the sword of peace," because "peace" is also a motif of the Tuathaan. The "sword" here wmight symbolize the extra insult faced by the Aiel - they think they would never break an oath, but to find out they stopped being peaceful is as insulting as taking up a sword. Or it could be because Rand is a sword-user, and Rand told the Aiel of the "peaceful" past that they once adhered to.

I tend to write long-winded, so I shouldn't take issue with brevity, but would you like to express why you picked that passage? Or what you think it might reveal? Or how it could be an unnoticed thing that will play large in a later moment?
Reply to message
Could the item we missed from the dragon reborn be... - 16/10/2010 08:49:27 PM 2109 Views
its more a metaphor - 16/10/2010 09:27:45 PM 953 Views
Almost certainly not. Do you have more that you wish to state about this theory? - 16/10/2010 09:37:26 PM 976 Views
Well, sure, since you asked so nicely. - 16/10/2010 10:02:16 PM 1052 Views
Well, that actually raises some possibilities - 16/10/2010 10:38:03 PM 922 Views
No. - 16/10/2010 11:44:58 PM 899 Views
Ooh! Ooh! It's this, isn't it? *NM* - 17/10/2010 12:02:11 AM 504 Views
You wish *NM* - 17/10/2010 04:11:39 AM 369 Views

Reply to Message