But the important number is three.
Three doesn't fit Slayer at all, of course (and why should it? He obviously didn't do the deed,
). Nor does it really fit Graendal. It may fit Demandred because he was a part of the alliance of three Foresaken. Mesaana as well I suppose.But maybe you mean three in a totally different context.
They have one general Forsaken entry.
It points to Slayer (especially since he seems to have an important role in the plot of ToM), or maybe Taim.
Why would they need separate entries to reveal that Graendal did it?
And why do you think Slayer will have a big role in ToM? He's not even been seen since WH! I'm not sure he's even been mentioned since WH... Just like he vanished from the books pertinent to Asmodean's death.
I suppose having his very own Glossary entry makes him the killer ... Just like Graendal wouldn't have a POV in ToM.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
I just received my review copy of ToM
- 15/10/2010 10:52:23 PM
19833 Views
Thanks for showing off Mr. Fancy Pants
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1619 Views
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1619 Views
I've received some interesting things over the years
- 16/10/2010 12:39:59 AM
1878 Views
Meh. I wish people would get over it.
- 16/10/2010 08:04:37 AM
1733 Views
Seriously. A lot of people have been so stupid over this whole style thing. Sheesh!
- 17/10/2010 01:31:45 AM
1593 Views
See, I never anticipated it being the same in the first place...
- 17/10/2010 03:20:16 AM
1568 Views
Lucky you!
- 16/10/2010 01:56:16 AM
1571 Views
Oh, just think about belief and order a bit
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1831 Views
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1831 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 02:06:36 AM
1577 Views
I'm only 160 pages into it and won't finish it tonight...I think
- 16/10/2010 02:17:53 AM
1793 Views
I'd be interested in this question as well, once you've finished. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 02:28:39 AM
1592 Views
Has it lived up to your initial excitement on looking at the ending thus far? *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:11:44 AM
966 Views
It's a surprising book in many ways
- 16/10/2010 03:25:13 PM
1807 Views
A few questions, assuming you've now finished
- 16/10/2010 03:39:57 PM
1659 Views
I don't read in a lineal fashion, so I'm only 50% done
- 16/10/2010 03:58:34 PM
1761 Views
Damn. I bet we're in for a cliffhanger. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:01:56 PM
1453 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1637 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1637 Views
I think you'd have denied it if it weren't true. I call unspoken confirmation. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:13:47 PM
1607 Views
Is this in reference to Brandon's 'small unnoticed detail' from books 4-6?
- 17/10/2010 10:35:37 PM
1776 Views
Ironically Sanderson's signature looks like he tried to cross out his own name from the title page *NM*
- 16/10/2010 12:22:33 PM
941 Views
Warning for everyone who tends to read the Glossary first
- 16/10/2010 03:16:09 PM
1932 Views
Certainly...
- 16/10/2010 03:36:29 PM
1847 Views
Or it might be that the glossary reveals that the murderer him/herself gets done over in ToM.
- 16/10/2010 03:41:21 PM
1651 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1847 Views
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1847 Views
Demandred killed Asmodean?
- 16/10/2010 04:34:27 PM
1588 Views
The Forsaken don't get own entries
- 16/10/2010 05:18:27 PM
1702 Views
Re: The Forsaken don't get own entries
- 17/10/2010 12:52:38 AM
1608 Views
Oh I know!
- 16/10/2010 04:44:54 PM
1697 Views
Those are separate things
- 16/10/2010 04:48:31 PM
1757 Views
Can you at least say this much
- 16/10/2010 05:26:55 PM
1687 Views
Some found it so
- 16/10/2010 05:28:56 PM
1900 Views
That would seem to rule out everyone but...
- 17/10/2010 10:33:08 PM
1684 Views
Obviously Slayer has the power to block someone from the OP for three seconds!
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1707 Views
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1707 Views
I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:06:14 PM
2166 Views
Re: I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:25:27 PM
1830 Views
Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 04:33:12 PM
1793 Views
Re: Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 11:50:54 PM
1552 Views
Um, I know that
- 16/10/2010 11:52:04 PM
1560 Views
I know you know that. I was just noting the odd thing you hinted at explicitly. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:55:21 PM
1465 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 04:24:51 PM
1585 Views
And one last general question from me
- 16/10/2010 05:51:51 PM
1463 Views
Thematically, TGS
- 16/10/2010 06:00:47 PM
2004 Views
Thanks, I'm happy with either the thematic or "stuff happening" model. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 06:40:22 PM
1337 Views
I forgot to mention that the dedication page references both Linda and Mike *NM*
- 17/10/2010 12:24:40 AM
1021 Views
You now sound as cryptic as Sanderson does and Jordan did.
- 18/10/2010 06:29:45 PM
1463 Views
Ha! I actually said a lot more than I meant to, ironically enough
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1423 Views
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1423 Views

