But the important number is three.
Three doesn't fit Slayer at all, of course (and why should it? He obviously didn't do the deed,
). Nor does it really fit Graendal. It may fit Demandred because he was a part of the alliance of three Foresaken. Mesaana as well I suppose.But maybe you mean three in a totally different context.
They have one general Forsaken entry.
It points to Slayer (especially since he seems to have an important role in the plot of ToM), or maybe Taim.
Why would they need separate entries to reveal that Graendal did it?
And why do you think Slayer will have a big role in ToM? He's not even been seen since WH! I'm not sure he's even been mentioned since WH... Just like he vanished from the books pertinent to Asmodean's death.
I suppose having his very own Glossary entry makes him the killer ... Just like Graendal wouldn't have a POV in ToM.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
I just received my review copy of ToM
- 15/10/2010 10:52:23 PM
19891 Views
Thanks for showing off Mr. Fancy Pants
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1660 Views
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1660 Views
I've received some interesting things over the years
- 16/10/2010 12:39:59 AM
1931 Views
Meh. I wish people would get over it.
- 16/10/2010 08:04:37 AM
1779 Views
Seriously. A lot of people have been so stupid over this whole style thing. Sheesh!
- 17/10/2010 01:31:45 AM
1640 Views
See, I never anticipated it being the same in the first place...
- 17/10/2010 03:20:16 AM
1620 Views
Lucky you!
- 16/10/2010 01:56:16 AM
1618 Views
Oh, just think about belief and order a bit
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1877 Views
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1877 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 02:06:36 AM
1625 Views
I'm only 160 pages into it and won't finish it tonight...I think
- 16/10/2010 02:17:53 AM
1857 Views
I'd be interested in this question as well, once you've finished. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 02:28:39 AM
1642 Views
Has it lived up to your initial excitement on looking at the ending thus far? *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:11:44 AM
992 Views
It's a surprising book in many ways
- 16/10/2010 03:25:13 PM
1859 Views
A few questions, assuming you've now finished
- 16/10/2010 03:39:57 PM
1733 Views
I don't read in a lineal fashion, so I'm only 50% done
- 16/10/2010 03:58:34 PM
1804 Views
Damn. I bet we're in for a cliffhanger. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:01:56 PM
1507 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1694 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1694 Views
I think you'd have denied it if it weren't true. I call unspoken confirmation. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:13:47 PM
1671 Views
Is this in reference to Brandon's 'small unnoticed detail' from books 4-6?
- 17/10/2010 10:35:37 PM
1821 Views
Ironically Sanderson's signature looks like he tried to cross out his own name from the title page *NM*
- 16/10/2010 12:22:33 PM
964 Views
Warning for everyone who tends to read the Glossary first
- 16/10/2010 03:16:09 PM
2010 Views
Certainly...
- 16/10/2010 03:36:29 PM
1892 Views
Or it might be that the glossary reveals that the murderer him/herself gets done over in ToM.
- 16/10/2010 03:41:21 PM
1724 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1911 Views
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1911 Views
Demandred killed Asmodean?
- 16/10/2010 04:34:27 PM
1633 Views
The Forsaken don't get own entries
- 16/10/2010 05:18:27 PM
1772 Views
Re: The Forsaken don't get own entries
- 17/10/2010 12:52:38 AM
1653 Views
Oh I know!
- 16/10/2010 04:44:54 PM
1750 Views
Those are separate things
- 16/10/2010 04:48:31 PM
1802 Views
Can you at least say this much
- 16/10/2010 05:26:55 PM
1735 Views
Some found it so
- 16/10/2010 05:28:56 PM
1953 Views
That would seem to rule out everyone but...
- 17/10/2010 10:33:08 PM
1725 Views
Obviously Slayer has the power to block someone from the OP for three seconds!
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1759 Views
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1759 Views
I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:06:14 PM
2237 Views
Re: I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:25:27 PM
1892 Views
Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 04:33:12 PM
1850 Views
Re: Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 11:50:54 PM
1596 Views
Um, I know that
- 16/10/2010 11:52:04 PM
1610 Views
I know you know that. I was just noting the odd thing you hinted at explicitly. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:55:21 PM
1516 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 04:24:51 PM
1634 Views
And one last general question from me
- 16/10/2010 05:51:51 PM
1510 Views
Thematically, TGS
- 16/10/2010 06:00:47 PM
2051 Views
Thanks, I'm happy with either the thematic or "stuff happening" model. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 06:40:22 PM
1396 Views
I forgot to mention that the dedication page references both Linda and Mike *NM*
- 17/10/2010 12:24:40 AM
1045 Views
You now sound as cryptic as Sanderson does and Jordan did.
- 18/10/2010 06:29:45 PM
1507 Views
Ha! I actually said a lot more than I meant to, ironically enough
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1473 Views
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1473 Views

