Please explain why you think what you do and provide some evidence to support your case. Otherwise you are just making crap up to fit your own interpretation.
Ignoring your cheap shot at his character/motivations, what you consider your "evidence" is not at all conclusive.
Incidentally, and I know professors don't like to see students use it as a source, according to Wikipedia:
"The real danger of balefire, however, is that it can undo (or erase) the past actions of anyone it hits... Balefire has different effects based on what it hits. For living beings, a mere touch seems to be enough to wipe the entire being from existence. For normal structures and objects, it seems to destroy only what it touches."
Most other online sources I've searched all seem to say pretty much the same thing about balefire: "When it encounters anything living, that thing is instantly destroyed, and depending on the strength of the beam, the thread of that thing is burned back in time, which may result in undoing things which it has done."
This message last edited by TaskmasterJack on 27/10/2010 at 03:06:44 AM
Prologue: A Question on Gateways
25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
- 1372 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM*
25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM
- 346 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM*
25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM
- 306 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities
25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM
- 783 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it
26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM
- 656 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
- 762 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM*
25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM
- 267 Views
thats not true
26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
- 718 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
- 673 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
- 666 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is...
27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM
- 730 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it.
26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM
- 648 Views
I don't agree
26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM
- 754 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
- 755 Views
Re: Balefire
27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM
- 758 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me
27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM
- 773 Views
A weave should be destroyed
26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM
- 596 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely.
27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM
- 752 Views