Active Users:628 Time:27/10/2026 04:38:02 PM
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker Send a noteboard - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
I should say first that I haven’t read it. Also this may have been covered in other thread that I missed but it just came to me and thought to ask everyone.

My question, how come Graendal’s Gateway weave isn’t destroyed by Rand’s Balefire? Shouldn't the weave have been wiped out, thus never opening in the first place, or do the temporal properties of Balefire only work on non-power things?
This message last edited by Night Walker on 25/10/2010 at 08:37:32 PM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1850 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 557 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 598 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1362 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 491 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 486 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 1179 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 1235 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 1170 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 1256 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 1231 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1271 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 1188 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 1070 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 1164 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 1020 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 1040 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1345 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 1150 Views

Reply to Message