Active Users:870 Time:02/05/2026 07:08:15 PM
Huh? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 01/11/2010 09:30:56 PM

He is sexist; he is a guy; he is the Dark One. Honestly, what more do you need? You're right, he is being unfair for the most part but why does it make sense for him to be fair?

We have no proof that the Dark One is male, or even if gender applies to him.

And it doesn't make sense for him to be fair. But it makes even less sense for him to be sexist.
Reply to message
My first impressions of ToM (Spoilers of Doom inside!) - 31/10/2010 02:24:12 PM 2298 Views
Thanks a lot and have some questions - 01/11/2010 09:05:44 AM 1062 Views
I just got my copy this morning - 01/11/2010 02:10:44 PM 1097 Views
Re: I just got mines this morning - 01/11/2010 02:32:39 PM 1109 Views
Yes it was... - 01/11/2010 03:28:53 PM 1127 Views
That's upsetting to me. - 01/11/2010 03:46:11 PM 1046 Views
It upset me too.. - 01/11/2010 04:15:08 PM 1151 Views
Re: It upset me too.. - 01/11/2010 05:49:50 PM 1038 Views
He isn't being arbitrary.. - 01/11/2010 07:07:40 PM 989 Views
Re: He isn't being arbitrary.. - 01/11/2010 08:58:22 PM 968 Views
Huh? - 01/11/2010 09:30:56 PM 889 Views
Re: Huh? - 01/11/2010 10:40:52 PM 969 Views
But... - 01/11/2010 10:47:47 PM 945 Views
Re: But... - 01/11/2010 11:35:20 PM 1066 Views
Graendal... - 01/11/2010 11:53:15 PM 1332 Views
Re: Graendal... - 02/11/2010 04:08:19 AM 1090 Views
Agreed... - 02/11/2010 04:47:42 AM 942 Views
Re: Agreed... - 02/11/2010 07:14:52 PM 950 Views
That would be perfect!! *NM* - 03/11/2010 02:54:23 PM 410 Views
Re: Huh? - 01/11/2010 11:17:34 PM 910 Views
Right and wrong... - 01/11/2010 11:54:10 PM 979 Views
If you're right, the series is saying that sexism is evil. I don't see a problem with that. *NM* - 02/11/2010 03:03:21 AM 498 Views
Except sexism is a core element/theme of the series - 03/11/2010 02:23:37 PM 970 Views
It might have been rape....... with the Quote - 08/11/2010 08:44:29 AM 1215 Views
Re: My first impressions of ToM (Spoilers of Doom inside!) - 01/11/2010 08:00:03 PM 1020 Views

Reply to Message