Active Users:107 Time:07/12/2022 08:07:01 PM
Re: I haven't read ToM yet, so please don't spoiler too much for me, but... Kythorian Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 02:18:37 PM
It would indeed have been nice to know if the reasoning behind people's Graendal theories was right, or if she did it in a different manner.


I guess it doesn't, but there is the same evidence against Slayer as there was before. Basically that we knew very little about what he could do before book 10, and it was supposted to be obvious in book 5 who did it. As far as we knew at that point, slayer had no way of getting rid of the body or any of several other problems. Also, in book 10, when we get Slayer's POV, he thinks with pride about killing the two BA in tear back in book 4. But doesn't think about the Forsaken he killed?(under this theory). Really, there is no reason to go there. Just accept that Graendal did it personally. It makes sense that she was there. She had means, motive, and opportunity.

Also, from ToM, Graendal doesn't seem to have worked with Slayer much in the past, but i don't think that is explicitly stated.
Reply to message
Asmodean *SPOILER* - 02/11/2010 07:12:29 PM 1223 Views
Graendal was responsible for 3 forsaken deaths... - 02/11/2010 07:30:30 PM 1076 Views
So there was nothing specifically.. - 02/11/2010 07:36:16 PM 744 Views
There is a story beind the killing... - 02/11/2010 07:38:37 PM 686 Views
yeah but - 02/11/2010 07:42:25 PM 680 Views
well originally RJ never intended to mention it in the books at all - 03/11/2010 04:06:18 PM 586 Views
at the end - 02/11/2010 07:32:47 PM 869 Views
Re: at the end - 02/11/2010 07:39:33 PM 610 Views
I haven't read ToM yet, so please don't spoiler too much for me, but... - 02/11/2010 08:48:47 PM 611 Views
Re: I haven't read ToM yet, so please don't spoiler too much for me, but... - 04/11/2010 02:18:37 PM 525 Views
I'm wrong. Apparently there is a scene - 04/11/2010 07:01:41 PM 594 Views
Super secret hidey hole - 03/11/2010 01:43:47 AM 603 Views
Re: Super secret hidey hole - 03/11/2010 08:23:35 AM 561 Views

Reply to Message