Active Users:178 Time:18/05/2024 01:18:56 PM
Re: Verin *spoiler Kythorian Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 08:24:22 PM
Anybody else find it odd that she didn't have a backup in case Mat didn't open the letter in time, which he didn't? Something as important as that and she totally relies on her assumptions of Mat's character. When was the last time she spent some time with him?

I find the whole deal a bit out of character, Verin's. not Mat's.


To be fair, as important as Caemlyn's destruction may seem to us, in the grand scheme of things, in Verin's eyes, it was really kind of a side issue. Nice if it can be prevented, and worth a letter, but not crippling to the Light(well, she didn't know about the dragons, so not crippling to the light as far as she knows), and not worth a whole lot of her time. It was a mistake, but to be fair, we, as the fans, who have been inside Mat's head for a dozen books, almost all thought he would open the thing too. So it seems reasonable that she make this mistake, especially since it wasn't all that important of one.

And even though the letter didn't get opened, at least the Band would be in Caemlyn to fight the shadowspawn. She also had no way of knowing that Elayne would take half the band to Cairhein, or that Mat would be gone.

So most of the screw-up isn't really her fault. And we don't know exactly how restrictive the whole 'she can't betray the DO' is, so I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt for now.
This message last edited by Kythorian on 04/11/2010 at 08:25:12 PM
Reply to message
Verin *spoiler - 04/11/2010 07:21:29 PM 1153 Views
Re: Verin *spoiler - 04/11/2010 08:24:22 PM 831 Views
Re: Verin *spoiler - 04/11/2010 08:56:01 PM 723 Views
Re: Verin *spoiler - 04/11/2010 09:02:15 PM 750 Views
2 things - 16/11/2010 05:06:31 PM 609 Views
Yes, it is really odd *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:46:51 PM 464 Views
Re: 2 things - 16/11/2010 07:01:19 PM 643 Views
Re: 2 things - 17/11/2010 08:02:03 AM 603 Views
Re: 2 things - 01/12/2010 03:10:56 PM 508 Views
Warding was not enough - 17/11/2010 10:03:02 AM 681 Views
Answer: - 28/11/2010 02:10:51 PM 594 Views
Re: Answer: - 28/11/2010 02:29:16 PM 546 Views
agreed - 28/11/2010 02:27:32 PM 591 Views

Reply to Message