Active Users:712 Time:14/12/2025 08:39:05 PM
I agree Rand is using her. She's still an odious little character though. Variant Send a noteboard - 08/11/2010 09:10:44 AM
Would their really be any doubt that she would attempt to usurp Rand as soon as she got control of the White Tower? It's so completely in character for her. Rand obviously knows this, which suits him just find, considering he wants the forces united and ready for TG, mind as well use Egwene as a tool to do that for him.

What I really find interesting though, is that Egwene's insistence that Nynaeve, Elayne, etc - kneel, kiss her ring and call her Mother and that Gawyn can only be her "partner" if he swears to obey her every whim. Even at his darkest, Rand never attempted to force his friends, or indeed mere friendly acquaintances like Bashere to address him by title, and he certainly isn't trying to reduce Min to his obedient little slave. Egwene is, when you get right down to the core of her, an odious little character. Easily one of my least favorite "protagonists" in fiction.
Reply to message
Rand and Egwene (spoilers) - 07/11/2010 02:06:28 AM 1772 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene (spoilers) - 07/11/2010 02:22:33 AM 975 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene (spoilers) - 07/11/2010 02:26:00 AM 1045 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene (spoilers) - 07/11/2010 01:03:56 PM 932 Views
I wonder - 07/11/2010 09:49:02 AM 957 Views
I agree - Rand's plan inspires horror because it seems destined to fail. - 08/11/2010 03:22:00 PM 843 Views
I hope Cadsuane spanks her. *NM* - 07/11/2010 12:07:01 PM 388 Views
Re: was Rand using her - 07/11/2010 03:22:41 PM 977 Views
Re: was Rand using her - 07/11/2010 08:10:28 PM 1028 Views
Agreed - 08/11/2010 03:24:34 AM 861 Views
I agree Rand is using her. She's still an odious little character though. - 08/11/2010 09:10:44 AM 958 Views
Re: I agree Rand is using her. She's still an odious little character though. - 08/11/2010 01:59:30 PM 889 Views
I agree with this. - 08/11/2010 05:58:38 PM 979 Views
Re: I agree with this. - 08/11/2010 09:04:51 PM 778 Views

Reply to Message