Active Users:1339 Time:02/11/2025 12:10:38 PM
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... moondog Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM
Sure, the book had faults, but really, I didn't expect this level of fanboy-rage. Haters gonna hate I guess.

If I could choose things to be done differently, it would be Graendal's survival (that WAS poor writing) and Mat's letter. But these minor points aside, I found the rest of the book to be pretty good in general. It didn't have the oomph of TGS, but I never expected it to, since it followed Mat and Perrin, who are ultimately supporting characters.


they're more main characters than the real main character, rand al'thor. especially in the last two books.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 10:40:47 AM 2262 Views
I love Ituralde, slightly A-teamish but better more realistic than most of the stuff in there *NM* - 29/11/2010 03:15:03 PM 655 Views
I agree here. - 29/11/2010 04:23:37 PM 1304 Views
and it is still realistic. After all, Luck is part of reality *nod* *NM* - 29/11/2010 05:16:39 PM 559 Views
Agreed - 30/11/2010 12:50:35 AM 1282 Views
Oh, I loved the scene with Perrin's Hammar - 29/11/2010 05:15:48 PM 1605 Views
Mats letter +1. Then the others... - 29/11/2010 06:00:59 PM 1466 Views
Healing the madness makes sense - 30/11/2010 03:51:35 AM 1245 Views
Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 29/11/2010 06:57:38 PM 1468 Views
I always imagined he'd have better spelling skills, though. - 29/11/2010 07:09:20 PM 1219 Views
he does. *NM* - 29/11/2010 09:25:19 PM 580 Views
this is wrong (from canon) - 29/11/2010 09:24:35 PM 1398 Views
bunch of geeks take this too serious :p - 30/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 1184 Views
Given how poorly edited both books have been so far - 30/11/2010 01:13:58 AM 1289 Views
Yes - 30/11/2010 02:02:28 AM 1360 Views
Re: this is wrong (from canon) - 30/11/2010 04:18:14 PM 1311 Views
nah - 30/11/2010 04:28:53 PM 1306 Views
I disagree... - 01/12/2010 05:20:37 PM 1076 Views
I liked it - 30/11/2010 12:55:41 AM 1111 Views
Re: Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 30/11/2010 11:11:50 AM 1115 Views
That is what made me think Mat wrote the letter that way on purpose. - 30/11/2010 01:57:26 PM 1379 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 11:41:48 PM 1287 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? ...Just one... - 30/11/2010 12:36:05 AM 1189 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:03:09 AM 1361 Views
Re: Ituralde - 30/11/2010 03:57:55 AM 1289 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:12:11 AM 1332 Views
Worst part of reading the book was logging on here afterwards. - 30/11/2010 03:44:50 AM 1397 Views
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM 1535 Views
plainly you are a Blasphemer and Great Traitor. - 30/11/2010 11:51:07 AM 1235 Views
"We're done, al'Thor. From now on, I care nothing for you." - 30/11/2010 04:44:16 AM 1254 Views
I became stupider having read that monologue. *NM* - 02/12/2010 05:17:31 AM 709 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:09:32 PM 1178 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 01/12/2010 02:31:32 PM 1196 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 02/12/2010 08:17:40 AM 1158 Views
My argument is probably not valid, but I'll give it anyway - 02/12/2010 05:13:58 PM 1139 Views

Reply to Message