Active Users:1525 Time:17/12/2025 07:10:15 AM
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". Culhane0428 Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM
I thought the idea is that touching the dark one with the OP is what tainted it. Rand knows this, and he will find a way to avoid touching the dark one with OP while sealing the dark one to such a state that it is eventually forgotten. I suggest this will require the shadar logoth power--Moridin's "old enemy, old friend"

My best guess is that he will use the unbuffered callandor with the two most powerful women available (Alivia and Nynaeve) to channel all of the true power into the shadar logoth ruby. It is totally possible the dagger will be lodged in his side at the time, and he will burn himself to ashes in the process.... hence..... blood and bloody ashes. I'm only half joking.

Reply to message
Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 02:12:42 AM 1418 Views
Why does the OP usage need to disappear for rand to succeed? - 29/11/2010 02:49:36 AM 968 Views
Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 29/11/2010 03:10:20 AM 852 Views
Re: Perhaps "obvious" is the wrong word - replace it with "most likely". - 30/11/2010 12:07:20 PM 850 Views
how do cannons out-range channelers? Rand says he can channel up to 5 miles away. - 30/11/2010 08:37:34 PM 787 Views
In order for time to conitune along it's wheel-like path. - 29/11/2010 01:36:08 PM 1103 Views
Oh yes, it's a huge giveaway by brandon... - 29/11/2010 05:09:19 PM 865 Views
Whichever author wrote it, fact remains that it's a pretty big reveal. - 30/11/2010 04:08:30 AM 775 Views
Of course there is - 30/11/2010 10:01:09 AM 775 Views
Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 29/11/2010 05:52:56 PM 927 Views
Re: Not really - the taint was the result of an improper Seal - 30/11/2010 04:11:35 AM 793 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 29/11/2010 11:26:49 PM 784 Views
Yes, I know that. - 30/11/2010 04:13:12 AM 881 Views
Re: Saidin and Saidar - 05/12/2010 08:40:01 AM 870 Views

Reply to Message