Active Users:1989 Time:02/05/2026 09:43:00 AM
Why do we have stronger channelers now? GameMaster Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 04:50:18 PM
This I believe is the intervention of the Pattern itself. Stronger channelers were needed for the LB and the Pattern provided. If the LB wouldn't have happened for another 2 thousand years all of those who channel wouldve been in big trouble, with less channelers and much weaker ones at that.
Reply to message
/ Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 02:24:23 PM 1436 Views
Numbers - 01/12/2010 04:09:02 PM 941 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 07:55:42 PM 1341 Views
Re: / Theory - Decline in the number of chanellers - 01/12/2010 09:14:48 PM 1211 Views
Thank god for that - 01/12/2010 09:35:22 PM 951 Views
Partly correct. - 02/12/2010 04:40:13 PM 1028 Views
Why do we have stronger channelers now? - 02/12/2010 04:50:18 PM 877 Views
you'd think the Seanchan would have even lower numbers of channellers - 02/12/2010 05:13:36 PM 934 Views
Maybe over time - 02/12/2010 07:24:08 PM 798 Views
The consolidation only ended (relatively) recently though - 03/12/2010 02:49:22 AM 896 Views
yes and no - 04/12/2010 02:20:13 PM 893 Views
Re: yes and no - 04/12/2010 03:06:10 PM 846 Views
Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 04/12/2010 03:16:40 PM 1034 Views
Re: Not so, common folk don't trust Wilders either... - 05/12/2010 04:17:40 PM 840 Views
Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 05/12/2010 04:27:45 PM 896 Views
Re: Don't mistake Wilders with women like Sharina - 06/12/2010 04:23:52 PM 787 Views
none of the others could actively channel. - 06/12/2010 04:34:31 PM 1001 Views

Reply to Message