I'm not trying to shoot anyone's opinions down, nor am I trying to say that the hatred for ToM isn't unfounded, I just would like to know why the people who do hate ToM (and there do seem to be a lot of you floating around) hated it so?
I can understand the writing style of BS really turning people off, but we kind of had to expect this of the middle of the "final book", didn't we? I mean, when RJ died, a good portion of tGS was either written or at least well prepared, and since BS has already stated before that the ending has been written by RJ, its safe to assume that AMoL will still have a good portion of RJ left in it. I personally don't hate BS's style; it takes some getting used to, but I don't think its as atrocious as people are making it out to be.
I personally rather liked ToM. tGS was much better (my second favorite of the series), but it was still good, considering we do have CoT and WH to look back on. Sure, there were moments when I cringed, but there were moments like that in tGS as well (Rand shaking his fist at the DO, anyone?). I thought Mat was written well, and while I know certain things are just not gonna be explained, I'm okay with that. Maybe its just me; I've been reading since I was 2, and over the years I've come to accept that things don't always have to be explained. Not saying that those of you who want everything explained are wrong; just saying that is who I am.
Anyway, I guess this thread is really just a rant thread for those who want to voice their ire, their frustration, and their outright hate for ToM. I would like to understand why.
I can understand the writing style of BS really turning people off, but we kind of had to expect this of the middle of the "final book", didn't we? I mean, when RJ died, a good portion of tGS was either written or at least well prepared, and since BS has already stated before that the ending has been written by RJ, its safe to assume that AMoL will still have a good portion of RJ left in it. I personally don't hate BS's style; it takes some getting used to, but I don't think its as atrocious as people are making it out to be.
I personally rather liked ToM. tGS was much better (my second favorite of the series), but it was still good, considering we do have CoT and WH to look back on. Sure, there were moments when I cringed, but there were moments like that in tGS as well (Rand shaking his fist at the DO, anyone?). I thought Mat was written well, and while I know certain things are just not gonna be explained, I'm okay with that. Maybe its just me; I've been reading since I was 2, and over the years I've come to accept that things don't always have to be explained. Not saying that those of you who want everything explained are wrong; just saying that is who I am.
Anyway, I guess this thread is really just a rant thread for those who want to voice their ire, their frustration, and their outright hate for ToM. I would like to understand why.
Whats with all the hate?
- 05/12/2010 03:46:29 PM
2038 Views
well it's a fan-site so we're nit-picky
- 05/12/2010 04:14:34 PM
1287 Views
Re: well it's a fan-site so we're nit-picky
- 05/12/2010 04:18:15 PM
1159 Views
Sanderson just makes him too much of a clown for me
- 05/12/2010 04:21:34 PM
1264 Views
Re: Sanderson just makes him too much of a clown for me
- 05/12/2010 11:23:37 PM
1157 Views
Yup, Sanderson has no subtly, or at least assumes that his readers have an IQ of 6.
- 06/12/2010 01:04:44 AM
1063 Views
hater gotta hate! *strikes a pose* *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:31:03 PM
527 Views
and lovers gotta love? Uncritically? *NM* *NM*
- 05/12/2010 08:22:13 PM
542 Views
Lovers can love and still be critical.
- 05/12/2010 08:46:40 PM
1034 Views
This.
- 05/12/2010 09:19:24 PM
1308 Views
exactly. ToM had it's flaws, but it was still satisfying
- 05/12/2010 10:39:58 PM
1061 Views
Re: exactly. ToM had it's flaws, but it was still satisfying
- 05/12/2010 11:15:46 PM
1138 Views
If you don't find it acceptable, fine, but I do. reading is not objective.
- 05/12/2010 11:58:50 PM
1126 Views
Re: If you don't find it acceptable, fine, but I do. reading is not objective.
- 06/12/2010 07:17:03 AM
1204 Views
Re: If you don't find it acceptable, fine, but I do. reading is not objective.
- 06/12/2010 12:10:30 PM
1110 Views
Hate is such a strong word....
- 05/12/2010 07:35:04 PM
1434 Views
Re: Hate is such a strong word....
- 05/12/2010 08:25:23 PM
1266 Views
Re: Hate is such a strong word....
- 05/12/2010 09:07:27 PM
1511 Views
I agree with you on just about everything, but have you considered ...
- 05/12/2010 10:59:50 PM
1155 Views
I'd love to see a re-edit of ToM and TGS
- 06/12/2010 01:10:00 AM
1092 Views
Personally I don't get it. If I wanted to read Shakespeare I would've picked up Hamlet.
- 05/12/2010 08:24:04 PM
1035 Views
Re: Personally I don't get it. If I wanted to read Shakespeare I would've picked up Hamlet.
- 05/12/2010 08:28:09 PM
1125 Views
Yeah, what's wrong with the Hobbit?
- 05/12/2010 09:22:38 PM
1252 Views
*lol* You can still agree but not on everything!
- 05/12/2010 11:36:55 PM
1153 Views
- 05/12/2010 11:36:55 PM
1153 Views
I liked the book alright, but I tend to talk about the good and exciting things first
- 06/12/2010 04:44:54 AM
1149 Views
Hitler told the Jews ahead of time what he had planned for them: why are they so bitter?
- 06/12/2010 12:52:08 PM
1335 Views
Wow. I had no idea people felt this way.
- 07/12/2010 03:30:08 AM
1292 Views
Similarly short, similar number of Perrin/Faile/Shaido chapters,
- 07/12/2010 09:59:48 AM
1107 Views
