Active Users:414 Time:17/06/2025 12:39:52 AM
Curse your twisted logic!... But no, he would want Rand to believe he's not or there is no Creator *NM* newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 15/12/2010 05:41:43 PM
Reply to message
Voice heard by Rand (spoiler for those who haven't read EotW) - 14/12/2010 10:31:25 PM 1806 Views
I love the spoiler warning! *NM* - 14/12/2010 10:47:43 PM 540 Views
Lol spoiler warning indeed - 14/12/2010 10:56:27 PM 1148 Views
=) Well he sure looked surprised - 14/12/2010 11:01:06 PM 1088 Views
Unless that's what he wants you to think ... *NM* - 14/12/2010 11:20:56 PM 506 Views
Exactly. WIFOM FTW! *NM* - 15/12/2010 07:46:29 AM 484 Views
Curse your twisted logic!... But no, he would want Rand to believe he's not or there is no Creator *NM* - 15/12/2010 05:41:43 PM 390 Views
Until I joined this board I didn't even remember that voice. *NM* - 14/12/2010 11:01:50 PM 386 Views
There was some debate about the Creator getting personally involved. - 14/12/2010 11:01:56 PM 1253 Views
Big debates yes, but never really a consensus. Opinions were always divided. - 15/12/2010 01:34:55 AM 1212 Views
Well reasoned - 15/12/2010 02:01:15 AM 1062 Views
Re: Well reasoned - 15/12/2010 03:07:12 AM 1139 Views
Maybe the Creator. Maybe Shai'tan. Maybe something else. RAFO. *NM* - 14/12/2010 11:26:14 PM 375 Views
There was a theory that it was Artur Hawkwing - 15/12/2010 07:31:05 AM 869 Views
I hope your kidding :p *NM* - 15/12/2010 08:40:12 PM 372 Views
Huh? Why couldn't it be? - 16/12/2010 06:25:08 AM 819 Views
Doesn't make sense. - 16/12/2010 07:46:05 PM 798 Views
Why doesn't it make sense? - 17/12/2010 02:30:06 AM 718 Views
Re: Why doesn't it make sense? - 18/12/2010 07:05:15 AM 788 Views
Re: Why doesn't it make sense? - 18/12/2010 02:51:02 PM 792 Views
But - 22/12/2010 05:49:01 PM 759 Views
Still possible. I don't think it's the Creator. - 22/12/2010 06:54:33 PM 726 Views
Head indeed - 23/12/2010 06:54:31 AM 744 Views
...EoTW spoiler warning? Really? - 15/12/2010 08:56:59 PM 1133 Views
It was Bela. *NM* - 15/12/2010 08:58:22 PM 376 Views

Reply to Message