Active Users:405 Time:31/07/2026 12:40:33 AM
You can rephrase as 'What's more important to you, being Aes Sedai or being Queen of Andor' ajfurst Send a noteboard - 17/12/2010 02:54:19 AM
If she answers Aes Sedai she's not fit to be Queen.
The High Seats of Andor should ensure whilst she'll listen to the Amrylin, she's a Queen who is Aes Sedai, not an Aes Sedai who is a Queen. And she must act always as Queen first, Aes Sedai second where they conflict.
Reply to message
Elayne kissing Egwene's ring? - 15/12/2010 09:11:34 PM 1918 Views
Hm. Lord Agalmar was pretty subsevient to the Amyrlin in tGH. - 15/12/2010 09:39:21 PM 1423 Views
Borderlanders have great respect for Aes Sedai - 15/12/2010 09:50:25 PM 1191 Views
The Amyrlin Seat is considered to rank above a monarch. - 15/12/2010 10:09:39 PM 1323 Views
It's a mere mark of respect to the Amyrlin Seat (the position, not the woman) - 16/12/2010 02:01:17 AM 1468 Views
Interesting points - 16/12/2010 10:41:52 AM 1118 Views
Re: Interesting points - 16/12/2010 01:57:56 PM 1151 Views
I disliked her actions - 16/12/2010 03:46:44 PM 1056 Views
This deserves its own thread.. - 16/12/2010 08:51:05 PM 1281 Views
Re: This deserves its own thread.. - 17/12/2010 02:30:21 PM 1365 Views
Re: This deserves its own thread.. - 17/12/2010 04:46:28 PM 1059 Views
Nice catch!! - 17/12/2010 07:09:43 PM 1100 Views
Yep, unsustainable conflict of interest here. - 18/12/2010 05:44:38 AM 1135 Views
I think we largely agree, but... - 17/12/2010 06:59:46 PM 1137 Views
Elaida / Siuan versus Morgase springs to mind - 16/12/2010 07:00:21 AM 1277 Views
Re: Elaida / Siuan versus Morgase springs to mind - 16/12/2010 07:56:41 PM 1192 Views
yes, because that question is totally a yes/no question - 16/12/2010 11:49:34 PM 1104 Views
What's simplicity got to do with it? - 17/12/2010 01:19:12 AM 1045 Views
You can rephrase as 'What's more important to you, being Aes Sedai or being Queen of Andor' - 17/12/2010 02:54:19 AM 1216 Views
The Nobles don't really have any reason to assume the Amyrlin would do that - 20/12/2010 08:50:54 PM 1056 Views

Reply to Message