Active Users:711 Time:30/01/2026 05:34:44 PM
Re: The second one isn't connected. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM
The number of occasions of channeling women hurting him is undefined. The AS kidnapping him is certainly one. If things go badly the Field of Merrilor could be the second.
But Perrin being at Dragonmount was the second time.


Disagree. Perrin didn't do anything there, he just observed. When reading it I was looking for some sign that he might have done something but there was no indication that Perrin's presence mattered to Rand.


Viewing was about Perrin "being there", not about Perrin rescuing or helping Rand. Dragonmount event definitely counts as fulfilling the viewing.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 2032 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 558 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1126 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 988 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 797 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 869 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 792 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1047 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 935 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1167 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 425 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1023 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 861 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 878 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 858 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 892 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 957 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 813 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 893 Views

Reply to Message