Active Users:1000 Time:14/09/2026 03:35:10 PM
Re: Nope. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).


He WAS there. So the viewing came true.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 2170 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 624 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1242 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 1105 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 908 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 1006 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 911 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1172 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 1043 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1287 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 478 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1138 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 984 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 991 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 981 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 1003 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 1085 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 935 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 1012 Views

Reply to Message