Active Users:535 Time:29/10/2026 05:53:56 PM
Re: Nope. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).


He WAS there. So the viewing came true.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 2206 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 639 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1280 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 1138 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 933 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 1044 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 945 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1208 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 1077 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1325 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 495 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1185 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 1016 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 1025 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 1014 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 1036 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 1124 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 973 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 1043 Views

Reply to Message