Active Users:1284 Time:31/07/2026 04:42:12 AM
Re: Nope. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).


He WAS there. So the viewing came true.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 2141 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 611 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1227 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 1083 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 885 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 980 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 894 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1153 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 1017 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1265 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 469 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1118 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 966 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 969 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 955 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 985 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 1065 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 916 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 998 Views

Reply to Message