"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.
If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).
If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).
When Perrin and Rand are together, the fireflies hold off the darkness in Min's viewings. When Rand was on DM, Perrin saw darkness, descirbed as oure evil, consuming him. The dark aura had almost completly covered Rand but then Perrin came closer and shouted out to him, willing him not to give in. This was enough to hold the darkness at bay and give Rand enough time to have his epiphany, shown by the sudden tiny beam of light in the middle of the maelstrom which then grew and shook off the dark. If Perrin hadn't been there to give his support the DO's evil would have completely taken Rand over.
C xx
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him
- 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM
1921 Views
I just want to point out..
- 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM
1016 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM
685 Views
Don't like this since Perrin is FINALLY in the same room as Rand. One should happen now *NM*
- 23/12/2010 08:33:05 AM
386 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM
685 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did
- 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM
737 Views
The second one isn't connected.
- 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM
1053 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected.
- 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM
932 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected.
- 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM
759 Views
Nope.
- 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM
733 Views
Re: Nope.
- 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM
769 Views
I wonder if Sanderson's division of this story into two books affected this plot
- 24/12/2010 09:03:31 PM
738 Views
Re: I wonder if Sanderson's division of this story into two books affected this plot
- 24/12/2010 11:39:48 PM
735 Views
Re: Nope.
- 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM
842 Views