Active Users:178 Time:08/05/2024 09:10:34 AM
yep *NM* Lo'oris Send a noteboard - 25/01/2011 10:44:04 AM
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Reply to message
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM 1717 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson - 23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM 1133 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM* - 24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM 342 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM* - 24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM 344 Views
Disagree... - 25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM 730 Views
yep *NM* - 25/01/2011 10:44:04 AM 304 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM 623 Views
Huh? - 23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM 833 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM 863 Views
Re: No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve - 24/01/2011 09:34:03 AM 938 Views
Is that really the case? A lot was cut from ToM? *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:16:05 PM 287 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM* - 24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM 344 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM* - 24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM 318 Views
No, because it is not a participle. - 24/01/2011 11:36:12 PM 730 Views
Sure it is - 25/01/2011 11:31:29 AM 759 Views
No. I have written: I sweated a lot when I was in India. *NM* - 25/01/2011 12:16:39 AM 337 Views
Um, yes,. sweated is the past tense of to sweat. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:37:58 AM 364 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common - 25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM 742 Views
Meh. I see no problem with this example. - 26/01/2011 07:10:53 AM 681 Views
If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM 430 Views
I was kind of thinking this myself - 13/02/2011 10:50:07 AM 673 Views

Reply to Message